2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical guidelines, computed tomography scan, and negative appendectomies: a case series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas recent studies suggest that the negative appendectomy rate when CT is selectively utilised is approximately 5–10%,23 the negative appendectomy rate in our study was only 1.1%. This improvement can be partly attributable to the improved resolution of 16-slice MDCT versus older imaging technology.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas recent studies suggest that the negative appendectomy rate when CT is selectively utilised is approximately 5–10%,23 the negative appendectomy rate in our study was only 1.1%. This improvement can be partly attributable to the improved resolution of 16-slice MDCT versus older imaging technology.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The falsepositive rate for clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis with subsequent removal of a normal appendix is as high as 25%. 1 This false-positive rate is felt to be justified due to the morbidity and mortality associated with appendiceal perforation.…”
Section: Possible Answersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often stool culture results take time to produce, and waiting for these results may put the patient at a high risk of appendiceal perforation 5 . Despite the high false-positive rate, surgery is often justified due to the morbidity and mortality associated with appendiceal perforation 6 . Secondly, there is minimal literature suggesting eosinophilia and elevated serum immunoglobulin E levels as features of nematode infections, this may or may not be true, but these are non-specific markers and our patient had normal levels 5 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%