1970
DOI: 10.1080/00039896.1970.10667212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Hypersensitivity to Cigarette Smoke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors ( 5 , 66,82) have proposed that a person can develop a true allergy to tobacco smoke. However, this theory has never been proved, and the studies in question seem to be controversial.…”
Section: Passive Smokingpossible Mechanisms and Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors ( 5 , 66,82) have proposed that a person can develop a true allergy to tobacco smoke. However, this theory has never been proved, and the studies in question seem to be controversial.…”
Section: Passive Smokingpossible Mechanisms and Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In connection with the question of induction of allergic reactions by smoke constituents, Schoen & Pizer (1964), Schroder (I967) and Savel (1970) reported on various findings. They observed changes of leucocytes during allergic reactions and, using various methods of examination, they tried to study the significance of tobacco constituents on changes of the blood.…”
Section: Leucocytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cigarette smoke inhalation has been implicated in the etiology and pathogenesis of a number of respiratory diseases in man (12), and recently attention has been drawn to the possible role of immune suppression in the development of some of these diseases (9). Scattered information in the literature (4,5,7,8,11,16) indicates that the immune system in man may be affected to some degree by smoking, and chronic inhalation experiments in this laboratory using small animals have clearly shown progressive depression of both humoral and cell-mediated immunity during exposure (13)(14)(15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%