2010
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2009.370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical impact and resource utilization after stem cell mobilization failure in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional mobilization attempts result in increased use of growth factors and antibiotics, increased transfusional support, more apheresis procedures, and more frequent hospitalizations leading to increased morbidity and cost, and can delay ASCT, if not preclude it altogether [15][16][17][18]. Patients remobilized with G-CSF 1 plerixafor had lower failure rates than those remobilized with G/C, G-CSF, and/or GM-CSF, but plerixafor adds significant cost [18][19][20]. Early identification of patients likely to fail during their initial mobilization attempt could trigger intervention in these high-risk patients to improve collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional mobilization attempts result in increased use of growth factors and antibiotics, increased transfusional support, more apheresis procedures, and more frequent hospitalizations leading to increased morbidity and cost, and can delay ASCT, if not preclude it altogether [15][16][17][18]. Patients remobilized with G-CSF 1 plerixafor had lower failure rates than those remobilized with G/C, G-CSF, and/or GM-CSF, but plerixafor adds significant cost [18][19][20]. Early identification of patients likely to fail during their initial mobilization attempt could trigger intervention in these high-risk patients to improve collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Although SCM using CY þ G is among the standards of care for the treatment of lymphoma and MM, our study suggests that there is the potential for alternative strategies to further improve outcomes with the adoption of cost-effective treatments. CY has the added potential of decreasing tumor load while aiding SCM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Also, a considerable proportion of patients without obvious risk factors for poor mobilization and up to 20% of healthy donors fail to increase sufficiently the number of progenitors in response to G-CSF, being idiopathic 'poor mobilizers'. [4][5][6] Plerixafor is a small molecule inhibitor of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor and blocks binding to its ligand, stromal cell-derived factor-1 alpha (SDF-1α). Devine et al 7 showed that a single subcutaneous dose of plerixafor led to a sixfold increase in circulating CD34+ cells in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%