2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rppnen.2014.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical impact of adaptive servoventilation compared to other ventilatory modes in patients with treatment-emergent sleep apnea, central sleep apnea and Cheyne–Stokes respiration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, adaptive servoventilation is not recommended in patients with HF and predominantly central SA 28. However, the safety concern that arose from this study should not be applied to patients with SA without HF receiving CPAP therapy, since adaptive servoventilation and CPAP therapy are completely different modes of applying positive airway pressure,29, 30 and the increased mortality was only demonstrated in patients already diagnosed with HF with reduced ejection fraction 13. Interestingly, the US preventive service task force recently recommended not to screen for OSA because of insufficient evidence on benefits and harms of a screening program and, especially, because of the lack of evidence concerning the potential beneficial effect of CPAP therapy on hard outcomes 31.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a result, adaptive servoventilation is not recommended in patients with HF and predominantly central SA 28. However, the safety concern that arose from this study should not be applied to patients with SA without HF receiving CPAP therapy, since adaptive servoventilation and CPAP therapy are completely different modes of applying positive airway pressure,29, 30 and the increased mortality was only demonstrated in patients already diagnosed with HF with reduced ejection fraction 13. Interestingly, the US preventive service task force recently recommended not to screen for OSA because of insufficient evidence on benefits and harms of a screening program and, especially, because of the lack of evidence concerning the potential beneficial effect of CPAP therapy on hard outcomes 31.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, CPAP seems to be ineffective in some patients. Correia et al [ 67 ] compared the clinical impact of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) with other forms of PAP in treating patients with TECSA, CSA, and Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR), and found that some CSA events persisted even with regular CPAP therapy. Fourteen out of 54 patients with an initial CSA diagnosis on CPAP titration night continued to meet the criteria for CSA at follow-up, and 16 of 382 patients (about 4%) not initially diagnosed with CSA developed novel CSA after 3 months of CPAP therapy.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASV is a novel ventilatory mode, which can provide a dynamic adjustment of inspiratory pressure support and a back-up respiratory rate. [ 67 ] ASV can alter pressure support accordingly based on a target minute ventilation calculated by measuring or estimating the respiratory output of the patient, in order to avoid central hypopnea/apnea events due to hyperventilation and associated hypocapnia [ 67 ] ; therefore, this device can provide more stabilized ventilation.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations