2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11739-018-1808-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical impact of application of risk assessment models (Padua Prediction Score and Improve Bleeding Score) on venous thromboembolism, major hemorrhage and health expenditure associated with pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis: a “real life” prospective and retrospective observational study on patients hospitalized in a Single Internal Medicine Unit (the STIME study)

Abstract: International guidelines recommend the use of pharmacological prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The same international guidelines suggest the employment of standardized risk assessment models (RAMs) when evaluating the administration of pharmacological prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. The Padua Prediction Score and the Improve Bleeding Score have been indicated as the best available RAMs to predict thrombotic and haemorrhagic risk in hospital… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings suggest that application of a RAM would change use of thromboprophylaxis significantly in our population of acutely ill patients with liver disease. Similar findings have been seen in application of IMPROVE RAM to acutely ill medical patients . Our study was single‐center at a tertiary care academic hospital so may not reflect practices at other centers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings suggest that application of a RAM would change use of thromboprophylaxis significantly in our population of acutely ill patients with liver disease. Similar findings have been seen in application of IMPROVE RAM to acutely ill medical patients . Our study was single‐center at a tertiary care academic hospital so may not reflect practices at other centers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…overall. 23 Overall rates of VTE were relatively low in our study at 4.1% with two patients with PVTs, one with superficial VTE and a single patient with a pulmonary embolus. Given the high frequency of spontaneous PVT in patients with liver disease, it is potential that the two PVTs captured were present on hospital admission.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[6][7][8] Without routine use of risk prediction tools, pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis is either under-or overprescribed in medically ill hospitalized patients. [9][10][11] The PPS is calculated based on 11 clinical criteria that are weighed and summed to a score that stratifies patients as either high or low risk for VTE occurrence. 8 To use PPS, a clinician can use an online calculator for computation but must input a response for each individual clinical criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%