2016
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical impact of GATA2 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia patients harboring CEBPA mutations: a study of the AML study group

Abstract: Conflict of interest:The authors declare no relevant conflict of interest in relation to the work described.AML with biallelic mutations in the CCAAT/enhancer-binding-protein-alpha gene (CEBPA bi ) 1 has now been included in the 2016 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) 2 classification of myeloid neoplasms as a definite entity due to its association with distinct 3 biological and clinical features as well as its prognostic significance. 1 Mutations in CEBPA 4 (CEBPA mut ) predominantly occur in acu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, GATA2 gene mutations are also found in de novo AML [175,176], being mainly concentrated within the exon 3 which encodes for the zinc finger domain 1, with a frequency near to 4%, which rises to 12% in the FAB M4 subtype [177]. Interestingly, GATA2 mutations are often associated with CEBPA biallelic mutations and, with lower incidence, to NPM1 and FLT3 mutations [176,178]. Furthermore, patients harboring both CEBPA biallelic and GATA2 mutations show a more favorable prognosis and better OS than those with CEBPA biallelic mutations alone [175].…”
Section: Gata2 Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, GATA2 gene mutations are also found in de novo AML [175,176], being mainly concentrated within the exon 3 which encodes for the zinc finger domain 1, with a frequency near to 4%, which rises to 12% in the FAB M4 subtype [177]. Interestingly, GATA2 mutations are often associated with CEBPA biallelic mutations and, with lower incidence, to NPM1 and FLT3 mutations [176,178]. Furthermore, patients harboring both CEBPA biallelic and GATA2 mutations show a more favorable prognosis and better OS than those with CEBPA biallelic mutations alone [175].…”
Section: Gata2 Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(A) Left, GATA-2 N-finger mutations in human AML patients with biallelic CEBPA mutations. [160][161][162][163]174,175 V296 corresponds to GATA-1 V205, which enhances GATA-1 and FOG-1 binding. Right, C-finger mutations identified in AML-associated diseases.…”
Section: Human Disease Mutations Inform Gata Factor Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…159 In AML patients with biallelic CEBPA mutations, GATA2 mutations are present with frequencies of ;30% of patients, with most mutations being N-finger missense. [160][161][162] N-finger mutations were described in 22% of patients with acute erythroid leukemia. 163 Although N-finger mutations are known to disrupt GATA-1 function in humans 164 and experimental models, 165,166 how N-fingers mutations impact GATA-2 function is unknown ( Figure 4A).…”
Section: Human Disease Mutations Inform Gata Factor Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they stated that the mutational GATA2 status does not allow to further refine risk stratification of this disease category. 23 In a study by Gröschel et al, GATA2 was the most commonly mutated transcription factor in inv(3)/t(3;3) myeloid malignancies with 15% prevalence and all occurred in ZF1 or ZF2. Furthermore, GATA2 mutations were negatively correlated with RUNX1 mutations, but enriched in samples with SF3B1 mutations.…”
Section: Gatazf Mutations: Incidence and Clinical Correlations In Hmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In their study, mutations in GATA2 did not impact clinical outcome, neither in the overall AML patient cohort nor in distinct patient subgroups. Therefore, they stated that the mutational GATA2 status does not allow to further refine risk stratification of this disease category …”
Section: Gata2 Zf Mutations: Incidence and Clinical Correlations In Hmentioning
confidence: 99%