Clinical impact of left atrial remodeling pattern in patients with atrial fibrillation: Comparison of volumetric, electrical, and combined remodeling

Abstract

IntroductionAtrial fibrillation (AF) is accompanied by various types of remodeling, including volumetric enlargement and histological degeneration. Electrical remodeling reportedly reflects histological degeneration.PurposeTo clarify the differences in determinants and clinical impacts among types of remodeling.MethodsThis observational study included 1118 consecutive patients undergoing initial ablation for AF. Patients were divided into four groups: minimal remodeling (left atrial volume index [LAVI] < mean value and no low‐voltage area [LVA], n = 477); volumetric remodeling (LAVI ≥ mean value and no LVA, n = 361); electrical remodeling (LAVI < mean value and LVA presence, n = 96); and combined remodeling (LAVI ≥ mean value and LVA presence, n = 184). AF recurrence and other clinical outcomes were followed up for 2 and 5 years, respectively.ResultsMajor determinants of each remodeling pattern were high age for electrical (odds ratio = 2.32, 95% confidence interval = 1.68–3.25) and combined remodeling (2.57, 1.88–3.49); female for electrical (3.85, 2.21–6.71) and combined remodeling (4.92, 2.90–8.25); persistent AF for combined remodeling (7.09, 3.75–13.4); and heart failure for volumetric (1.71, 1.51–2.53) and combined remodeling (2.21, 1.30–3.75). Recurrence rate after initial ablation increased in the order of minimal remodeling (20.1%), volumetric (27.4%) or electrical remodeling (36.5%), and combined remodeling (50.0%, p < .0001). A composite endpoint of heart failure, stroke, and death occurred in the order of minimal (3.4%), volumetric (7.5%) or electrical (8.3%), and combined remodeling (15.2%, p < .0001).ConclusionVolumetric, electrical, and combined remodeling were each associated with a unique patient background, and defined rhythm and other clinical outcomes.