2021
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Impact of the Early Use of Monoclonal Antibody LY-CoV555 (Bamlanivimab) on Mortality and Hospitalization Among Elderly Nursing Home Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Abstract: Importance Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreaks are frequent occurrences in nursing homes and long-term care facilities (LTCFs), resulting in subsequent hospitalization and death. Rationale Virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies demonstrate a significant decrease in both viral load and hospital transfer rate among patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection. Objective To assess the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with mild-to-modera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report the clinical use of bamlanivimab together with etesevimab in daily clinical practice, a few months after the drugs have been introduced in Italy. In our experience, the rate of hospital admission after BEC infusion was low (11.0%) and similar to the results obtained in other previous clinical experiences focusing on bamlanivimab alone, in which the percentage of hospital admission was reported to be up to 10% of the cases [20][21][22][23]. The reduction in the need for subsequent health resource utilization remained low despite the higher proportion of older persons with comorbidities included in the present study [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report the clinical use of bamlanivimab together with etesevimab in daily clinical practice, a few months after the drugs have been introduced in Italy. In our experience, the rate of hospital admission after BEC infusion was low (11.0%) and similar to the results obtained in other previous clinical experiences focusing on bamlanivimab alone, in which the percentage of hospital admission was reported to be up to 10% of the cases [20][21][22][23]. The reduction in the need for subsequent health resource utilization remained low despite the higher proportion of older persons with comorbidities included in the present study [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Previous studies evaluating bamlanivimab and etesevimab administered together have demonstrated that such combination significantly decreased SARS-CoV-2 log viral load as well as the need for hospital admission [12,13], leading to their approval from the EUA by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of mild and moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting [16]. Nevertheless, post-marketing information is very scarce [19][20][21][22][23], and at present, data regarding the correct timing for BEC infusion are lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 studies were identified for full-text review and 40 studies were excluded because they had no comparison groups between Bamlanivimab treatment and control or outcomes were not available. A total of 8 studies [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] comprising of 13573 adult patients with COVID-19, including 4191 in the BAM (administered alone) and 9382 in the control group arm, were included in this meta-analysis.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While evidence supports the effectiveness of mAbs at reducing hospitalization and mortality rates in real-world settings, most studies have focused on clinical outcomes rather than patient-centric outcomes such as symptom burden [ 5 8 , 10 , 11 , 32 34 ]. Findings are mixed regarding symptom burden over time, with several studies reporting a reduction in symptom duration or time to symptom resolution with mAbs but another study reporting that mAbs did not shorten symptom duration [ 35 – 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%