2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical impacts of genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing for rare autosomal trisomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such cases, we propose that the correct diagnosis (truth) is placental mosaicism, and all the observed data are true and accurate. More recent studies argue that detecting placental mosaicism for RAT is in the best interest for optimal management of a pregnancy 36,37 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such cases, we propose that the correct diagnosis (truth) is placental mosaicism, and all the observed data are true and accurate. More recent studies argue that detecting placental mosaicism for RAT is in the best interest for optimal management of a pregnancy 36,37 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies argue that detecting placental mosaicism for RAT is in the best interest for optimal management of a pregnancy. 36,37 Cell-based NIPT is a promising approach to genetic prenatal diagnosis, although the current inability to recover 5-10 cells in >95% of cases limit its widespread adoption. If sufficient cells could be recovered, it is feasible to perform high-coverage whole genome sequencing (WGS) on trophoblasts 38 raising the possibility of noninvasive trio WGS in the first trimester.…”
Section: Clinical and Analytical Performance With Spike-in Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the advantage of NIPT in detecting genome-wide chromosomal anomalies (Bianchi and Wilkins-Haug., 2014), more studies have investigated the use of NIPT in detecting rare autosomal trisomies, including trisomy 9 (Lee et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2020;Li et al, 2022). However the positive predictive value of NIPT for rare autosomal trisomies is low (4%-6%) in the general obstetrical population (van der Meij et al, 2019;Van Den Bogaert et al, 2021), and approximately 40% of all rare autosomal trisomy cases culminate in adverse perinatal outcomes (Xiang et al, 2023). Since most of the circulating fetal DNA in maternal plasma is derived primarily from the placental trophoblasts (Flori et al, 2004), and trisomy 9 is usually miscarried in the first trimester (López-Félix et al, 2017), invasive prenatal testing is strongly recommended for all gravidas with positive NIPT results of trisomy 9 to exclude placental or fetal mosaicism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to concerns about the unavoidable risks of invasive prenatal diagnosis methods, she chose NIPT for fetal autosomal aneuploidies screening at 16 +1 weeks of gestation after genetic counseling. Sample preparation, maternal plasma DNA sequencing, and bioinformatics analysis for NIPT were carried out using BGI platform (MGISEQ-2000, Shenzhen, China) as previously described (Xiang et al, 2023). NIPT analysis showed that the Z-scores of other chromosomes were all in the normal range (−3 < Z < 3) except for chromosome 9 (Z = 8.9898) with a cell-free fetal DNA fraction at 11.08% (3.5% is the least reliable cell-free fetal DNA level), suggesting a possibility of trisomy 9 or trisomy 9 mosaicism.…”
Section: Case Report Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies argue that detecting placental mosaicism for RAT is in the best interest for optimal management of a pregnancy. 38,39 Such abnormalities carry risks of miscarriage, birth defects, and low birth weight. It has been suggested that such pregnancies should be followed more closely, for example by more frequent ultrasounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%