2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical implementations of 4D pencil beam scanned particle therapy: Report on the 4D treatment planning workshop 2016 and 2017

Abstract: In 2016 and 2017, the 8th and 9th 4D treatment planning workshop took place in Groningen (the Netherlands) and Vienna (Austria), respectively. This annual workshop brings together international experts to discuss research, advances in clinical implementation as well as problems and challenges in 4D treatment planning, mainly in spot scanned proton therapy. In the last two years several aspects like treatment planning, beam delivery, Monte Carlo simulations, motion modeling and monitoring, QA phantoms as well a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
(120 reference statements)
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we did not consider the intrafractional changes, such as tumor respiratory motion during treatment, which also affected the dose distribution [25]. A 4D treatment plan based on daily 4DCT or real-time tumor tracking is a promising method to reduce these uncertainties, which have been recently discussed in particle RT [26][27][28]; moreover, the DIR method has its own uncertainties, although the dose warping errors are generally less than 3% [29,30]. Furthermore, a larger margin may be required to compensate for the interfractional deviations in BM while employing a scanning pencil beam technology; consequently, the effects induced by the changes in the WEL may be greater than those observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we did not consider the intrafractional changes, such as tumor respiratory motion during treatment, which also affected the dose distribution [25]. A 4D treatment plan based on daily 4DCT or real-time tumor tracking is a promising method to reduce these uncertainties, which have been recently discussed in particle RT [26][27][28]; moreover, the DIR method has its own uncertainties, although the dose warping errors are generally less than 3% [29,30]. Furthermore, a larger margin may be required to compensate for the interfractional deviations in BM while employing a scanning pencil beam technology; consequently, the effects induced by the changes in the WEL may be greater than those observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XCAT phantom uses diaphragm position to calculate its deformations, but many systems for breathing monitoring use a surrogate signal, such as chest wall deflection. Although the correlation of the (external) surrogate and tumor/diaphragm motion may vary from patient to patient and even fraction to fraction, 31 the XCAT phantom allows a convenient way to analyze, for example, Medical Physics, 0 (0), xxxx the impact of location of an external surrogate for an average patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the abdominal region, organ motion significantly affects treatment quality and can cause severe consequences in terms of accuracy in dose delivery. Thus, several strategies were proposed to mitigate respiratory motion or correlate the patient respiratory pattern to treatment planning and delivery …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, several strategies were proposed to mitigate respiratory motion or correlate the patient respiratory pattern to treatment planning and delivery. [8][9][10][11] For respiratory moving targets, the motion information is integrated in the treatment planning process by means of respiratory-correlated four-dimensional (4D) imaging, with 4D computed tomography (4DCT) being the current clinical standard. 12 The main limitation of using 4DCT as imaging modality for treatment planning is that this technique depicts an "average" respiratory cycle, being representative of the imaged anatomy only within the time interval of the imaging acquisition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%