2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Implications of Concomitant Surgical Intervention for Aortic Insufficiency with Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this prospective study, consecutive patients who received HeartMate 3 LVAD implantation at our institute between May 2015 and March 2019 were screened for study inclusion. Of them, patients who received concomitant aortic valve replacement at the time of LVAD implantation were excluded 9 . Remaining patients underwent assessment of AI severity using the below‐detailed novel Doppler echocardiography obtained at outflow graft at 3 months following LVAD implantation (defined as baseline).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this prospective study, consecutive patients who received HeartMate 3 LVAD implantation at our institute between May 2015 and March 2019 were screened for study inclusion. Of them, patients who received concomitant aortic valve replacement at the time of LVAD implantation were excluded 9 . Remaining patients underwent assessment of AI severity using the below‐detailed novel Doppler echocardiography obtained at outflow graft at 3 months following LVAD implantation (defined as baseline).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of them, patients who received concomitant aortic valve replacement at the time of LVAD implantation were excluded. 9 Remaining patients underwent assessment of AI severity using the below-detailed novel Doppler echocardiography obtained at outflow graft at 3 months following LVAD implantation (defined as baseline). For the assessment of worsening AI, we excluded those who already had moderate or greater AI at baseline.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%