2018
DOI: 10.5946/ce.2018.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Implications of Synchronous and Metachronous Multiple Gastric Tumors after Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Neoplasms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, considering the pathogenesis of gastric adenoma and cancer, the minimal follow-up period, and the possible upgrade pathology from adenoma to carcinoma in the resected specimen, we excluded patients whose records included the code for gastric cancer or who died within 1 year of the index date. To ensure the adenoma cohort was accurately identified, we performed code validation study (26). In this study, positive predictive value for diagnosing gastric adenoma was more than 95% with codes from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 and claim code for endoscopic resection, which are shown in the Supplementary Digital Content (see Supplementary Table 2, http:// links.lww.com/AJG/D32).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, considering the pathogenesis of gastric adenoma and cancer, the minimal follow-up period, and the possible upgrade pathology from adenoma to carcinoma in the resected specimen, we excluded patients whose records included the code for gastric cancer or who died within 1 year of the index date. To ensure the adenoma cohort was accurately identified, we performed code validation study (26). In this study, positive predictive value for diagnosing gastric adenoma was more than 95% with codes from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 and claim code for endoscopic resection, which are shown in the Supplementary Digital Content (see Supplementary Table 2, http:// links.lww.com/AJG/D32).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%