1989
DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(89)90540-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical implications of the epidermal growth factor receptor in the squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
2
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
60
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…EGFR is overexpressed in a wide variety of solid tumors, including cervical cancer. [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] In…”
Section: Biologic Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EGFR is overexpressed in a wide variety of solid tumors, including cervical cancer. [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] In…”
Section: Biologic Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of uterine cervical cancer, the incidence of EGFR overexpression has been variably reported to occur in 6 -85% of cases according to the detection techniques and methods used previously (7). Although there have been a few contradictory results (14), the majority of reports show that elevated levels of EGFR correlate with a more aggressive biological behavior and are clinically relevant to poor prognosis in cervical cancer patients (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, activation of the EGFR signaling pathway enhances the transcription of the rate-limiting COX-2 gene in several cell types (15,(27)(28)(29)(30). Although both EGFR and COX-2 enzyme are known to play a vital role in oncogenic transformation, carcinogenesis, and tumor invasiveness (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(15)(16)(17), little information is available regarding the relationship between EGFR and COX-2 in cultured cervical carcinoma cell lines or in human cervical cancer. Moreover, the prognostic significance of the coexpressions of EGFR and COX-2 has not been investigated despite the fact that the separate overexpression of EGFR (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) or COX-2 (23-25) is known as an independent prognostic indicator in uterine cervical cancer patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased expression of EFGR in the primary vulvar tumor was also significantly associated with lymph node metastases, but its predictive value was not properly addressed [14]. Studies on EGFR expression in other gynecologic malignancies showed that EGFR overexpression is associated with biological aggressiveness and poor prognosis in cervical cancer [20][21][22]. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for metastatic disease showed that EGFR overexpression in endometrial cancer is an independent predictor for the presence of metastases [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%