Hong Kong Med J 2020
DOI: 10.12809/hkmj208646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical manifestations and outcomes of COVID-19 in the paediatric population: a systematic review

Abstract: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the respiratory illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has affected hundreds of thousands of people. We aim to report the distribution of cases, prevalence, and clinical, radiological, and laboratory signs and outcomes of COVID-19 in paediatric patients. Moreover, we intend to evaluate neonatal clinical outcomes. Hence, our age range of interest is 0 to 19 years. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using the Medline database to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We included 18 reviews in our analysis. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Characteristics of the included reviews are shown in table 1; all are freely available online (see online supplemental appendix table 2). All reviews were in English.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We included 18 reviews in our analysis. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Characteristics of the included reviews are shown in table 1; all are freely available online (see online supplemental appendix table 2). All reviews were in English.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 One study provided descriptive data from included studies only and did not report pooled estimates of symptom prevalence. 25 Figure 2 shows the proportions of CYP in each review with reported symptoms or signs of COVID-19 data shown by study in online supplemental appendix table 3. The proportion who were asymptomatic ranged from 14.6% to 42%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight were high quality, 11 14 15 17 19 24 27 28 7 were medium, 16 18 20-23 26 and 3 were low quality. 12 13 25 The very great majority of studies within the reviews were of hospitalised CYP. No reviews specifically focused on symptoms or signs amongst community samples of infected children, and none compared symptoms in hospitalised compared with non-hospitalised children.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 One study provided descriptive data from included studies only and did not report pooled estimates of symptom prevalence. 25…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median age in the different series varies between 7 and 11 years. There is no significant difference by sex (21,22). Initially during the pandemic, it was thought that children did not become seriously ill, however more evidence has accumulated showing that children may require intensive care by ∼2 to 6% (22).…”
Section: Covid 19mentioning
confidence: 99%