Clinical Nursing Paths Benefit Patient Outcomes Undergoing Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract

Objective. The purpose of the study is to investigate patient outcomes of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) under clinical nursing paths (CNP) and whether the application of CNP can be a protective factor against the recurrence of HCC. Methods. The study comprised of 48 patients who received TACE for HCC under the CNP (assigned into the CNP group) and 41 who received TACE for HCC under the routine care (assigned into the control group). Their treatment safety, pain, and psychology were compared. The nursing satisfaction and quality of life were investigated when patients were discharged from the hospital. A 6-month follow-up was performed to analyze the related factors affecting disease recurrence. Results. In the CNP group, the incidence rate of total adverse reactions, VAS scores, SAS and SDA scores were lower, but conversely, the satisfaction and SF-36 scores were higher than those in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). Logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced TNM stage, larger tumor diameter, greater Child-Pugh classification, and the presence of peripheral blood vessel invasion were independent risk factors of HCC recurrence ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. The study demonstrated that CNP intervention can improve the safety and quality of life of patients undergoing TACE for HCC and reduce their negative emotions and pain feelings, which is worthy of clinical application.

Retracted: Clinical Nursing Paths Benefit Patient Outcomes Undergoing Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”