2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.09.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcome after biliary drainage for metastatic colorectal cancer: Survival analysis and prognostic factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is not sufficient to differentiate the likelihood of survival in stage IV cases. Therefore, new methods of predicting and improving outcome are being explored [ 7 10 ]. Numerous oncologists and clinical researchers have assessed the relevance of liver function tests (LFTs) for early detection of liver metastasis in patients with different types of cancer [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not sufficient to differentiate the likelihood of survival in stage IV cases. Therefore, new methods of predicting and improving outcome are being explored [ 7 10 ]. Numerous oncologists and clinical researchers have assessed the relevance of liver function tests (LFTs) for early detection of liver metastasis in patients with different types of cancer [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, Appendix 3). [1,2,[12][13][14][15][16] All studies were cohort studies without comparison group and patients were identified retrospectively. Five studies were single-center and two were multicenter studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12,13,16] In two studies either ERCP or PTC was initially used. [1,2] EUS was performed in two patients described in one study in whom initial ERCP failed. [2] Patient and disease characteristics are provided in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations