2010
DOI: 10.4244/eijv6i3a55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcome after endovascular, surgical or hybrid revascularisation in patients with combined carotid and coronary artery disease: the Finalised Research In ENDovascular Strategies Study Group (FRIENDS)

Abstract: Surgical and endovascular treatments yield very good immediate results; the later being less invasive, may be particularly suited to these fragile and complex patients. Long-term follow-up is under assessment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FRIENDS study is the first large, multicenter registry including 659 patients with combined COD and CAD undergoing percutaneous, hybrid, or surgical revascularization treatments. The 30-day results of the overall population have been reported previously (15). This report presents the short-and long-term outcomes in the pre-specified subgroup of patients (n ϭ 239) undergoing a combined percutaneous revascularization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The FRIENDS study is the first large, multicenter registry including 659 patients with combined COD and CAD undergoing percutaneous, hybrid, or surgical revascularization treatments. The 30-day results of the overall population have been reported previously (15). This report presents the short-and long-term outcomes in the pre-specified subgroup of patients (n ϭ 239) undergoing a combined percutaneous revascularization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The primary composite endpoint of death, MI and stroke was seen in 4.8%, 2.4% and 8.6% among the three groups, respectively (p=0.01) 60. In conclusion, the authors reported very good results in the short term with the use of both surgical and endovascular strategies.…”
Section: Carotid Stenting For Perioperative Stroke Risk Reductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…More recently, Ribichini60 published 30 day outcomes on 659 patients with concomitant carotid and coronary disease who were classified into three groups: surgical, endovascular and hybrid (defined as combination of surgical and endovascular intervention). The primary composite endpoint of death, MI and stroke was seen in 4.8%, 2.4% and 8.6% among the three groups, respectively (p=0.01) 60.…”
Section: Carotid Stenting For Perioperative Stroke Risk Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of this simultaneous approach compared with phase stenting include: higher comfort of the patient, and reduced incidence of complications related to puncture site, because femoral puncture is performed only once, and also cost-effectiveness because there is no need for repeated hospitalization 1 . Results of recently published multicentric, prospective, unrandomised study on 659 patients with coexistent coronary and carotid artery disease, strongly favor endovascular approach in treating these patients 11 . Adverse event rate (death, stroke or myocardial infarction) within thirty days was significantly lower among patients treated endovasculary in comparison with patients undergoing surgical or hybrid procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%