Clinical outcome and higher order aberrations after bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens

Pilger, Daniel; Homburg, David; Brockmann, Tobias; Torun, Necip; Bertelmann, Eckart; Sonnleithner, Christoph von

doi:10.1177/1120672118766809

Cited by 43 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Some clinical measurements of straylight and its effects in eyes implanted with the same IOL models tested here 18,19 are not in full agreement with our findings. However, it is necessary to take into account that straylight is commonly reported as a single value that corresponds with the average over a defined angular range.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 66%

Straylight in Different Types of Intraocular Lenses

Arias

Ginis

Artal

2020

Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 66%

Straylight in Different Types of Intraocular Lenses

Arias

Ginis

Artal

2020

Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Of 10 studies potentially relevant for this meta-analysis, one study enrolling patients with preexisting corneal astigmatism of 1.00 D or worse was excluded [17]. Ultimately, 9 studies were included in our quantitative analysis [9,10,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics and quality of the 9 studies that met all inclusion criteria [9,10,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”

Section: Results Of the Searchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Six studies [9,10,19,21,22,24] reported spectacle independence. There was a significant difference in the overall effect that favored higher spectacle independence with EDOF IOLs than with monofocal IOLs (RR: 2.81, 95% CI: 1.06 to 7.46, P = 0.04) ( Figure 4A).…”

Section: Spectacle Independencementioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy and safety of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Liu

Dong

Wang

2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenes (IOLs) in cataract surgery. Methods All comparative clinical trials that involved bilaterally implanting EDOF IOLs in patients with cataract were retrieved from the literature database. We used random effects models to pool weighted mean differences (WMD) and risk ratio (RR) for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Results Nine studies with a total of 1336 eyes were identified. The subgroup analysis was conducted according to the type of IOLs used in the control group. Compared with monofocal IOLs, EDOF IOLs produced better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (WMD: -0.17, 95% CI: -0.26 to -0.08, P = 0.0001) and uncorrected near visual acuity (WMD: -0.17, 95% CI: -0.21 to -0.12, P < 0.00001). EDOF IOLs resulted in reduced contrast sensitivity, more frequent halos, however, higher spectacle independence (RR: 2.81, 95% CI: 1.06 to 7.46, P = 0.04) than monofocal IOLs. Compared with trifocal IOLs, EDOF IOLs produced worse near visual acuity (MD: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.13, P<0.0001). EDOF IOLs performed better than trifocal IOls in contrast sensitivity, and there were no significant difference in halos and spectacle independence. Conclusions Increasing the risk of contrast reduction and more frequent halos, EDOF IOLs provided better intermediate and near VAs than monofocal IOLs. At the expense of near vision, patients receiving EDOF IOLs have better contrast sensitivity than those receiving trifocal IOLs. Halo incidence and spectacle independence of EDOF IOLs were similar to those of trifocal IOLs.

show abstract

“…Seven studies [10,18,[20][21][22][23][24] reported contrast sensitivity and the results are summarized in Table 3.…”

Section: Contrast Sensitivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 3. Two studies reported no significant difference in halos between EDOF and monofocal IOLs [20,21]. The U.S. FDA clinical trial reported that EDOF IOLs resulted in more frequent halos than monofocal IOLs [24].…”

Section: Contrast Sensitivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy and safety of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Liu

Dong

Wang

2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background : This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenes (IOLs) in cataract surgery. Methods: All comparative clinical trials that involved bilaterally implanting EDOF IOLs in patients with cataract were retrieved from the literature database. We used random effects models to pool weighted mean differences (WMD) and risk ratio (RR) for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Results: Nine studies with a total of 1336 eyes were identified. The subgroup analysis was conducted according to the type of IOLs used in the control group. Compared with monofocal IOLs, EDOF IOLs produced better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (WMD: -0.17, 95% CI: -0.26 to -0.08, P = 0.0001) and uncorrected near visual acuity (WMD: -0.17, 95% CI: -0.21 to -0.12, P < 0.00001). EDOF IOLs resulted in reduced contrast sensitivity, more frequent halos, however, higher spectacle independence (RR: 2.81, 95% CI: 1.06 to 7.46, P = 0.04) than monofocal IOLs. Compared with trifocal IOLs, EDOF IOLs produced worse near visual acuity (MD: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.13, P<0.0001). EDOF IOLs performed better than trifocal IOls in contrast sensitivity, and there were no significant difference in halos and spectacle independence. Serious postoperative complications were rare, with no adverse events were reported in most studies. Conclusions: Increasing the risk of contrast reduction and more frequent halos, EDOF IOLs provided better intermediate and near VAs than monofocal IOLs. At the expense of near vision, patients receiving EDOF IOLs have better contrast sensitivity than those receiving trifocal IOLs. Halo incidence and spectacle independence of EDOF IOLs were similar to those of trifocal IOLs.

show abstract

Clinical outcome and higher order aberrations after bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens

Abstract: The TECNIS Symfony intraocular lens can be considered an appropriate alternative to multifocal intraocular lenses because of good visual results at far, intermediate, and near distance as well as in low-contrast vision.

Cited by 43 publications

References 31 publications

Straylight in Different Types of Intraocular Lenses

Straylight in Different Types of Intraocular Lenses

Efficacy and safety of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy and safety of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About