2012
DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-11-0982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Outcome of Emergency Surgery for Complicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, mortality of open surgery for complicated acute type B dissection is up to 30%. [17][18][19] The Cleveland Clinic reported on TBAD, with open repair operative mortality of 8%, with 2.4% neurologic complications. Survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 82%, 78%, and 75%, respectively, and 14% required reintervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, mortality of open surgery for complicated acute type B dissection is up to 30%. [17][18][19] The Cleveland Clinic reported on TBAD, with open repair operative mortality of 8%, with 2.4% neurologic complications. Survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 82%, 78%, and 75%, respectively, and 14% required reintervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aortic dissection can place patients at risk for organ ischemia, which can start at the onset of dissection or later in the disease course and have lethal sequelae. Increased awareness of this complication, and the availability of better diagnostic tools, may improve the survival rates of patients with visceral ischemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that if a patient is found to have AAS based on unenhanced CT, he or she will have to undergo contrast-enhanced CT anyway to evaluate the therapeutic options, including emergency surgery. 21 Second, the positive predictive value of the unenhanced CT findings was relatively high (eg, 83.5%) when crescent, linear high density, internal displacement of intimal calcification, and TAA, the negative likelihood ratio was 0.08 and the negative predictive value was 93.3%.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 95%