2014
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcome of patients with implantation of second‐generation drug‐eluting stents in the right coronary ostium: Insights from 2‐year follow‐up of the TWENTE trial

Abstract: AO treatment of the RCA with second-generation DES is feasible, but our data suggest that stent coverage of the right AO segment remains a predictor of TLR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of these procedures is now better understood. There was no DES-treated control group, and the heterogeneity in the protocols, cohorts under study, and outcomes of previously published studies complicates any comparison 11,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] . In addition, operator preference at the time of the choice of the device (BVS versus DES) might have introduced a patient/lesion selection bias.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The importance of these procedures is now better understood. There was no DES-treated control group, and the heterogeneity in the protocols, cohorts under study, and outcomes of previously published studies complicates any comparison 11,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] . In addition, operator preference at the time of the choice of the device (BVS versus DES) might have introduced a patient/lesion selection bias.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predilation was performed in 97% of the lesions (vs. 96% in non-ostial, p=0.618), post-dilation in 43% (versus 58% in the non-ostial group, p=0.008). At quantitative coronary angiography, treatment of ostial lesions was associated with higher residual stenosis (30% [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] vs. 26% [20-37], p=0.035), but no difference in minimum lumen diameter existed (p=0.447). Follow-up data were available at 385 days.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The short-and long-term outcomes of PCI for RCA ostium have been unsatisfactory since the bare metal stent (BMS) era [16,17]. Although the clinical outcomes in PCI have significantly improved in the DES era compared to the BMS era [18], stenting to RCA ostium is still a predictor of TLR even using the second-generation DES [19]. This may be partly explained by the rigid nature of the vessel wall in the coronary ostium [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the era of nDES use, Lam et al. reported the feasibility of treating RCA aorto‐ostial lesions with nDES . However, not much are data available that directly compare clinical outcomes between nDES and eDES implantation for ostial RCA lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%