2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000221979.13847.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Outcome of Peripheral Nerve Decompression in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Abstract: Surgical decompression of peripheral nerves in patients with diabetes was reported to restore sensation and improve function. In this study, a retrospective review of 12 diabetic and 20 nondiabetic patients with lower-extremity peripheral neuropathy who underwent surgical decompression was performed. Clinical evaluation by Tinel test, muscle power examination, and 2-point discrimination were performed preoperatively, at 6 months, and between 9 and 15 months postdecompression. Clinical outcomes were classified … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Bilateral lower extremity peripheral nerve decompressions can improve balance in patients with an underlying peripheral neuropathy. 30 Siemionow and Demir have recently written an excellent review of the pathogenesis and multidisciplinary treatment of diabetic neuropathy in the microsurgery literature, 31 and Baravarian in the podiatry literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Bilateral lower extremity peripheral nerve decompressions can improve balance in patients with an underlying peripheral neuropathy. 30 Siemionow and Demir have recently written an excellent review of the pathogenesis and multidisciplinary treatment of diabetic neuropathy in the microsurgery literature, 31 and Baravarian in the podiatry literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten of 13 studies were performed and evaluated in unblinded fashion or by study designer only. 21,23,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31]33 Including patients with diabetic neuropathy and idiopathic neuropathy within the same study, 21,25,30 -32 or performing decompression of different nerves in the same study, 22,23,25,29,30,32 may introduce a bias. Two studies focused on diabetic patients with a positive Tinel sign (indicative of nerve entrapment), which could represent a bias when reporting on the effect of decompression surgery in all diabetic patients.…”
Section: Human Studiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Nine of these were based on case series 21,23,[25][26][27][28][29][30]32 and 4 were of prospective design. 22,24,33,34 The lack of standardized patient inclusion criteria and outcome measures makes comparison difficult; nevertheless, improvement after decompression surgery was reported using objective 2-point sensory testing in 10 studies, 21,22,24 -26,29 -33 subjective improvement of sensation and pain in 8 studies, 22,25-27,29 -32 recovery or prevention from development of ulcers in 3 studies, 23,27,28 and reduction of pain medication in 2 studies.…”
Section: Human Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die bislang vorliegenden nicht-randomisierten Studien belegen eine Verbesserung der Schmerzstärke in 70-90% (z. B. VAS 9,0 auf postoperativ 3,2; n=30; [18]), eine verbesserte Sensibilität in 60-95% der Fälle sowie eine Verhinderung von Ulcerationen und Amputation am dekomprimierten Bein [1,2,6,7,8,10,13,16,17,18] …”
Section: Surgical Techniqueunclassified