Clinical outcome of removable prostheses supported by mini dental implants. A systematic review

Goiato, Marcelo Coelho; Sônego, Mariana Vilela; Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza; Gomes, Jéssica Marcela de Luna; Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas da

doi:10.1080/00016357.2018.1499958

Cited by 20 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…No significant differences regarding cumulative 1‐year survival rate, both at the implant level and at the patient level between the Short‐ and the Standard‐MDI groups indicate good clinical behavior of short MDIs. Survival rates obtained in this study for the both groups are in accordance with other reports for standard length MDIs (Elsyad, ; Elsyad et al, ; Goiato et al, ; Griffitts et al, ; Hasan et al, ; Klein et al, ; Lemos et al, ; Marcello‐Machado, Faot, Schuster, Nascimento, & Del Bel Cury, ; Mundt, Schwahn, Biffar, & Heinemann, ; Mundt, Schwahn, Stark, et al, ; Park, Lee, & Shin, ; Peršić et al, ; Scepanovic et al, ; Šćepanović et al, ; Schiegnitz & Al‐Nawas, ; de Souza et al, ; Zygogiannis et al, ).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Good short‐ and intermediate‐term clinical results have been reported in the literature (Bornstein et al, ; Christensen & Swift, ; Elsyad, ; Elsyad, Gebreel, Fouad, & Elshoukouki, ; Enkling et al, ; Flanagan & Mascolo, ; Goiato et al, ; Hasan et al, ; Klein, Schiegnitz, & Al‐Nawas, ; Lemos et al, ; Šćepanović et al, ; Schiegnitz & Al‐Nawas, ; Shatkin & Petrotto, ; Shatkin, Shatkin, Oppenheimer, & Oppenheimer, ; de Souza et al, ; Zygogiannis, Aartman, Parsa, Tahmaseb, & Wismeijer, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A cohort study on short mini‐implants for mandibular overdentures compared to those of standard length

Kovačić

Peršić

Kranjčić

et al. 2019

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To assess peri‐implant bone level, survival and success rates of short (6 or 8 mm long) one‐piece mini‐implants (MDIs) in edentulous patients with extremely resorbed alveolar ridge (interforaminal height <10 mm) rehabilitated with mandibular implant overdentures and to compare them with patients having standard length MDIs in 1‐year prospective clinical study. Material and methods The Short MDI group consisted of 28 participants with interforaminal height ≤10 mm. Implants being, both, short and slim (short MDIs: 6 or 8 mm long, 2 or 2.5 mm wide) were inserted. The Standard‐MDI group included 35 participants (interforaminal height >13 mm) who received standard length MDIs (10–14 mm long, 2 or 2.5 mm wide). Primary outcomes were assessments of MDI peri‐implant bone level, survival and success rates; secondary outcomes were assessments of peri‐implant tissue, oral hygiene, and prosthodontic maintenance. Results The Short MDI group had mean marginal bone loss (MBL) of 0.26 ± 0.35 mm, 6.4% of failure, and 92.6% of, both, success and survival rates. The Standard‐MDI group had mean MBL of 0.34 ± 0.40 mm, 5% of failure, 95% of survival, and 94.3% success. There were no significant differences in MBL (p = .420), survival (p = .414), and success (p = .571) between the groups. The Short MDI group had significantly less plaque (p = .001) and bleeding on probing (p < .001). Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, short MDIs (6 or 8 mm long) in extremely atrophied mandibles (interforaminal height <10 mm) showed good clinical results in the first year of function.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

A cohort study on short mini‐implants for mandibular overdentures compared to those of standard length

Kovačić

Peršić

Kranjčić

et al. 2019

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The 2-year period of only 0.20 mm mean marginal bone loss in the crestal MDI region is in accordance with the outcomes reported for standard length (10 mm or longer) MDIs [30, 31]. The survival rate with 4 MDIs is also similar, which was reported in the dental literature to be from 89.0 to 99.4% for the period of 1 to 5 years of overdenture wearing [16, 32, 33].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Rehabilitation of an Extremely Resorbed Edentulous Mandible by Short and Narrow Dental Implants

Kovačić

Peršić

Kranjčić

et al. 2018

Case Reports in Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Serious consequences of long-term complete denture wearing may be extreme residual ridge atrophy and a reduced area of keratinized oral mucosa of a denture-bearing area. This paper presents five clinical cases of extreme mandibular ridge atrophy, rehabilitated by means of mandibular overdentures retained by short mini dental implants. The patients had a reduced mandibular bone volume in the interforaminal region, bone height less than 10 mm, and buccolingual bone width less than 4 mm. In order to avoid bone augmentation, patients received four short mini dental implants (MDIs) (6 or 8 mm long; 2.0 or 2.5 mm wide) for the support of mandibular overdentures, which is a new rehabilitation option. After insertion, the MDIs were early loaded with new mandibular overdentures reinforced with the CoCr framework. The patients have been wearing their overdentures for 2 years. One MDI broke during insertion and a new one was added. One patient lost one MDI but successfully continued to wear the overdenture retained by the remaining three MDIs. Mean marginal bone loss (MBL) was 0.20 ± 0.19 mm. Patients significantly improved their OHRQoL and chewing function by reducing the summary scores of the OHIP-14 and the chewing function questionnaires. The improvements remained unchanged throughout the observation period.

show abstract

“…Mastication parameters were observed to approach the values obtained in normal dentate subjects (Haraldson et al, 1988;Heckmann et al, 2009). This also applies to different type of implantretained overdentures (Tang et al, 1999;Feine et al, 2002;Awad et al, 2003;van der Bilt et al, 2012), including miniimplants (Batisse et al, 2016;Goiato et al, 2018;Yao et al, 2018). The improvement with implant-retained overdentures was delayed for more than 6 months after rehabilitation treatment.…”

Section: Adaptation Of Mastication To Changes In Functional Occlusionmentioning

confidence: 71%

Masticatory Adaptation to Occlusal Changes

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review deals with the frequent wide variability of masticatory capacity/incapacity. Neither researchers nor clinicians have taken sufficient account of this variability despite its implications for nutrition. Mastication in normal healthy oral conditions is first described, followed by a short presentation of the mechanisms of masticatory adaptation in the nervous system. Capacity, incapacity, and successful compensatory adaptation of mastication are then defined, along with the different methods used for their evaluation. Examples of adaptation needs are given, such as those concomitant with dental wear or occlusal changes. Finally, given its vital importance for deeply impaired mastication/deglutition function, the impact of masticatory adaptation processes on nutrition is examined.

show abstract

Clinical outcome of removable prostheses supported by mini dental implants. A systematic review

Abstract: The MDI-supported removable prostheses successfully improved patients' chewing and speaking ability, quality of life, and satisfaction, suggesting that MDIs are a viable and safe option to support removable prostheses in the mandibular arch.

Cited by 20 publications

References 32 publications

A cohort study on short mini‐implants for mandibular overdentures compared to those of standard length

A cohort study on short mini‐implants for mandibular overdentures compared to those of standard length

Rehabilitation of an Extremely Resorbed Edentulous Mandible by Short and Narrow Dental Implants

Masticatory Adaptation to Occlusal Changes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About