Clinical Outcome of Surgical Endarterectomy for Common Femoral Artery Occlusive Disease

Kuma, Sosei; Tanaka, Kiyoshi; Ohmine, Takahiro; Morisaki, Koichi; Kodama, Akio; Guntani, Atsushi; Ishida, Masaru; Okazaki, Jin; Mii, Shinsuke

doi:10.1253/circj.cj-15-1177

Cited by 43 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Acknowledging this limitation, overall the endovascular group had a higher risk of needing further revascularization at 1 year (16·0 (95 per cent c.i. 6·1 to 29·4) per cent; 4 studies, 167 procedures) in comparison with the CFE group (5·8 (1·0 to 14·2) per cent; 6 studies, 489 procedures). Results after 1 year were similar ( Table ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only ten studies collected data prospectively, of which five reported endovascular intervention and five reported CFE. Less than half of the studies (11 of 28) had a sample size of greater than 100 and follow‐up of 1 year or more, of which four were in the endovascular group and seven were in the CFE group ( Table S6 , supporting information).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The cumulative risk across all studies (two RCTs and 20 case series) was similar for endovascular procedures (2·7 (95 per cent c.i. 1·2 to 4·8) per cent; 7 studies, 381 procedures) and CFE (1·9 (0·7 to 3·8) per cent; 14 studies, 1508 procedures).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Results after 1 year were similar ( Table 2). Duration of follow-up for the four studies 9,19,20,22 in the endovascular group was 18, 24, 28 and 49 months, and that for the seven case series 31,32,34,35,37,38,42 in the CFE group was 16,36,39,43, 60 (two studies) and 180 months. Unfortunately, revascularization was not reported in the RCTs 6,7 .…”

Section: Efficacymentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Combining across all studies, the endovascular group had a lower 1-year primary patency rate than the CFE group: 78⋅8 (95 per cent c.i. 73⋅3 to 83⋅8) per cent (8 studies 7 -9,20,23,24,27,28 ; 496 procedures) versus 96⋅0 (92⋅2 to 98⋅6) per cent (9 studies 7,29,31,32,36,37,39,42,43 ; 498 procedures) respectively. A similar trend was seen for the longer-term primary patency rate ( Table 2).…”

Section: Efficacymentioning

confidence: 97%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Systematic review of endovascular intervention and surgery for common femoral artery atherosclerotic disease

Jia

Sun

Patel

et al. 2019

Journal of British Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Endovascular intervention has emerged as a potential alternative to open surgery in treating common femoral artery (CFA) atherosclerotic disease. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the safety and efficacy of both techniques. Methods Thirteen electronic databases from 1980 to 3 January 2018 were searched. Study quality was assessed using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Interventional Procedure Programme quality assessment tool. Safety and efficacy outcome measures were analysed. Results Thirty‐one studies reporting 813 endovascular procedures and 3835 endarterectomies were included. Only two small RCTs have been reported. The methodological quality of available studies was generally low and follow‐up short. Safety endpoint assessment revealed a similar risk of wound haematoma for endovascular intervention and endarterectomy (5·5 (95 per cent c.i. 0·2 to 17·2) versus 3·9 (1·7 to 6·9) per cent respectively), a lower risk of wound infection with endovascular procedures (0 versus 5·9 (3·4 to 9·0) per cent) and a lower risk of wound lymph leakage (0 versus 5·7 (3·3 to 8·6) per cent). Efficacy endpoint assessment at 1 year identified that endovascular intervention had a lower primary patency rate than endarterectomy (78·8 (73·3 to 83·8) versus 96·0 (92·2 to 98·6) per cent respectively), a higher revascularization rate (16·0 (6·1 to 29·4) versus 5·8 (1·0 to 14·2) per cent) and a similar amputation rate (2·7 (1·2 to 4·8) versus 1·9 (0·7 to 3·8) per cent). Conclusion Endovascular intervention of CFA disease appears to reduce the risk of wound complications but is associated with a lower patency rate and increased rates of subsequent revascularization procedures. Standardization of the endovascular technique and quantification of the proportions of patients suitable for either technique are required.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%