2023
DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Outcomes After Surgical Revascularization Using No-Touch Versus Conventional Saphenous Vein Grafts: Mid-Term Follow-Up of Propensity Score Matched Cohorts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these trials showed improved graft patency, while some failed to demonstrate improved graft patency. 5 More studies have tried to elucidate the precise mechanism of the no-touch technique on graft patency. In this study, both early- and mid-term graft patency rates were excellent in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these trials showed improved graft patency, while some failed to demonstrate improved graft patency. 5 More studies have tried to elucidate the precise mechanism of the no-touch technique on graft patency. In this study, both early- and mid-term graft patency rates were excellent in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%