2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcomes of combination versus monotherapy for gram negative non-HACEK infective endocarditis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Five patients in the aminoglycoside combination group experienced acute kidney injury compared to none in the monotherapy group ( p = 0.012). In spite of the small sample size and retrospective nature, this study provides an avenue to explore MT in patients with uncomplicated, non-HACEK, Gram-negative IE [ 101 ].…”
Section: Oral Antimicrobials For Iementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five patients in the aminoglycoside combination group experienced acute kidney injury compared to none in the monotherapy group ( p = 0.012). In spite of the small sample size and retrospective nature, this study provides an avenue to explore MT in patients with uncomplicated, non-HACEK, Gram-negative IE [ 101 ].…”
Section: Oral Antimicrobials For Iementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in NGNB have increased dramatically across the planet [ 25 , 26 ], making this a public health issue [ 27 ]. A single-center retrospective study involving 60 patients with Gram-negative infective endocarditis, found by ICD coding in the years 2011 to 2019 in Ohio, USA, attempted to answer the query on whether combination therapy was superior to monotherapy [ 28 ]. The frequency of intravenous substance abuse was high, 21/60 (35%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of intravenous substance abuse was high, 21/60 (35%). There was no difference in 60-day mortality, which was 7/34 (21%) in patients who had monotherapy vs. 5/26 (19%) of those on combination therapy [ 28 ]. This publication had small numbers of patients and a retrospective design, which means severity of illness at presentation may have affected treatment allocation, as there was more intravenous drug use, CNS involvement and metastatic sites at baseline in the combination therapy group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a majority of patients were treated with a beta-lactam and aminoglycoside [ 6 ]. A single-center retrospective cohort study by Lorenz et al evaluated a composite outcome of 60-day all-cause mortality, readmission, or recurrence of bacteremia comparing combination and monotherapy in 60 patients with non-HACEK gram-negative endocarditis [ 14 ]. There was no difference in the primary composite outcome between the monotherapy and combination therapy groups (62% vs 50%; P = .36) [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single-center retrospective cohort study by Lorenz et al evaluated a composite outcome of 60-day all-cause mortality, readmission, or recurrence of bacteremia comparing combination and monotherapy in 60 patients with non-HACEK gram-negative endocarditis [ 14 ]. There was no difference in the primary composite outcome between the monotherapy and combination therapy groups (62% vs 50%; P = .36) [ 14 ]. A small retrospective review of 20 patients with non-HACEK gram-negative endocarditis demonstrated higher 90-day mortality and infection-related readmission in patients who received combination beta-lactam and fluoroquinolone therapy (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.1–15.7; P = .03) [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%