2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors: a large multicenter retrospective study from the Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Research Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
49
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Bowel cancer screening whether via fecal immunochemical testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or primary colonoscopy, decreases the risk of future colorectal cancer significantly, and colonoscopy is the final common pathway in screening to remove polyps and prevent cancer 1,2 ; however, despite this effectiveness, it has also become evident that colonoscopy is not perfect and cancers occur after a "clear" colonoscopy at a rate of between 2.5% and 8.7% of the total cancers diagnosed, depending on the method used to calculate and the population. 3,4 The suggested mechanisms for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer include incomplete colonoscopy, missed lesions, incomplete polypectomy, and rapidly growing lesions. 5 These mechanisms apply both to cancers occurring after a clear colonoscopy, and to metachronous cancers occurring after a colorectal cancer is resected, which occurs after up to 3% of surgical resections.…”
Section: Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Bowel cancer screening whether via fecal immunochemical testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or primary colonoscopy, decreases the risk of future colorectal cancer significantly, and colonoscopy is the final common pathway in screening to remove polyps and prevent cancer 1,2 ; however, despite this effectiveness, it has also become evident that colonoscopy is not perfect and cancers occur after a "clear" colonoscopy at a rate of between 2.5% and 8.7% of the total cancers diagnosed, depending on the method used to calculate and the population. 3,4 The suggested mechanisms for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer include incomplete colonoscopy, missed lesions, incomplete polypectomy, and rapidly growing lesions. 5 These mechanisms apply both to cancers occurring after a clear colonoscopy, and to metachronous cancers occurring after a colorectal cancer is resected, which occurs after up to 3% of surgical resections.…”
Section: Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H emostatic clips are established as effective to control active colonic bleeding, 1 to prevent delayed perforation after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)-induced deep mural injury, 2 and to close free perforations occurring during EMR 3 and endoscopic submucosal dissection. 4 A common use of clips has been prophylactic closure of colorectal polypectomy sites, with intent to prevent delayed hemorrhage. This use of clips is controversial, because efficacy data on prophylactic clipping are mixed and clips are expensive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a reliable method for treating superficial colorectal tumors; however, it is technically more difficult and requires more experience than gastric ESD, because of difficulties associated with endoscope operability and the anatomical features of the colorectal region, including the presence of folds/flexures, bending of the intestinal tract, and the thinness of the intestinal wall . Main accidental complications during colorectal ESD are perforation and bleeding .…”
Section: Brief Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a method that can be used for en bloc resection, regardless of the size and form of the lesion [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. However, poor operability of the scope or the existence of submucosal fibrosis prevents successful ESD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%