2021
DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcomes of first line FOLFIRINOX vs. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic pancreatic cancer at the Yale Smilow Hospital System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the FFX group exhibited a median survival of 15.00 months, surpassing the previously recorded survival of 11.1 months [ 3 ], whereas the GnP group demonstrated a median survival of 11.04 months, also exceeding the previously recorded survival of 8.5 months [ 4 ]. In particular, FFX outperformed GnP significantly, which is consistent with many previous studies [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. However, some studies did not consider performance status at all [ 11 , 12 , 13 ], and others had very small numbers of patients included [ 11 , 13 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, the FFX group exhibited a median survival of 15.00 months, surpassing the previously recorded survival of 11.1 months [ 3 ], whereas the GnP group demonstrated a median survival of 11.04 months, also exceeding the previously recorded survival of 8.5 months [ 4 ]. In particular, FFX outperformed GnP significantly, which is consistent with many previous studies [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. However, some studies did not consider performance status at all [ 11 , 12 , 13 ], and others had very small numbers of patients included [ 11 , 13 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In particular, FFX outperformed GnP significantly, which is consistent with many previous studies [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. However, some studies did not consider performance status at all [ 11 , 12 , 13 ], and others had very small numbers of patients included [ 11 , 13 , 15 ]. Performance status is a factor that must be considered, as it has a significant impact on the selection of initial chemotherapy regimens.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“… 11 , 12 No randomized phase III study neither compared FOLFIRINOX versus GEM-NAB directly, but retrospective studies showed a trend toward greater OS in patients treated with FOLFIRINOX. 13 , 14 Recently, the first results of NALIRIFOX versus GEM-NAB, presented during ASCO congress, reported OS in favor of NALIRIFOX. 15 These data are opposed to other phase III recent trial, stopped for futility, showing a signal in favor of GEM-NAB over FOLFIRINOX regimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%