2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12185-020-03023-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcomes of gemtuzumab ozogamicin for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: single-institution experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall response rate was 52.3% and that was above the literature data. In the study of Hosono et al., all patients died in the first year, whereas in our study, 3 patients were alive in the first year [17] . Similar to the literature, response rates decreased the longer the follow-up.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall response rate was 52.3% and that was above the literature data. In the study of Hosono et al., all patients died in the first year, whereas in our study, 3 patients were alive in the first year [17] . Similar to the literature, response rates decreased the longer the follow-up.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Six patients responded to treatment and the overall response rate was 31.6% in this study. The most common adverse event was febrile neutropenia(84%) [17] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study showed that when GO was administered as a single agent, it appeared to be an effective option for treating relapsed AML, with a 31.6% response rate [19]. The same conclusion was reached by another study, which showed that GO had an antileukemic effect in AML patients with NPM1 mutation and significantly reduced the cumulative incidence of recurrence rate.…”
Section: Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It has been shown by both phase I/II clinical trials and retrospective studies that GO alone or in combination with various regimens was safe and effective in patients with the first relapse of AML [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. There are limited real-world data about the effect of GO on clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent AML [ 22 , 23 ]. Moreover, the use of GO in multiple relapses of AML patients has not yet been extensively investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%