2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcomes of MANTA vs suture-based vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An updated meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can speculate that this higher rate of bleeding complications in our study was related to higher immediate closure failure in the Prostar group (13.6% versus 4.5% in the Manta group, p = 0.01), which is in line with the literature with suture-based devices [29][30][31][32] and required more frequent use of covered stents.…”
Section: Bleeding Complicationssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We can speculate that this higher rate of bleeding complications in our study was related to higher immediate closure failure in the Prostar group (13.6% versus 4.5% in the Manta group, p = 0.01), which is in line with the literature with suture-based devices [29][30][31][32] and required more frequent use of covered stents.…”
Section: Bleeding Complicationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The data from this study are consistent with the literature in terms of vascular complications, with no significant differences between MANTA and suture-based devices [9][10][11][12]25,[29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Vascular Complicationssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations