2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty After Autologous Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Transplantation for Ocular Surface Burns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
62
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
62
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not completely new, as Rama et al 14 reported episodes of corneal graft rejection in about 50% of patients after PK on successful CLET, and Basu et al 34 showed that failure of PK after autologous CLET occurred in about 58% of eyes as a result of corneal graft rejection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is not completely new, as Rama et al 14 reported episodes of corneal graft rejection in about 50% of patients after PK on successful CLET, and Basu et al 34 showed that failure of PK after autologous CLET occurred in about 58% of eyes as a result of corneal graft rejection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Miri et al estimated in 2010 that, in the UK, a single CLET procedure cost approximately £10 300 (or about €12 000) 18. Despite having successfully performed over 500 CLET procedures for the treatment of LSCD since 2001,15 19 we felt that, in reality, CLET has become restricted to only a handful of advanced centres worldwide because of these limitations. Similarly, CLAU has also failed to garner universal acceptance because of the perceived risk of donor site complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case 3 is awaiting penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for a dense corneal scar. It was not performed along with SLET due to reports of poorer clinical outcomes of single-stage surgery (CLET with PKP) than a two-stage approach 29. Although Case 4 had maximum improvement in visual acuity (6/18), it was limited due to anterior corneal scar and may be considered for anterior lamellar keratoplasty in future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%