2014
DOI: 10.2739/kurumemedj.ms64001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Outcomes of the Cadenat Procedure in the Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After screening and eligibility assessment (Fig. 1), 44 studies [1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 14–16, 18, 19, 22, 24, 25, 27–34, 36, 37, 39, 40, 43, 44, 46, 47, 50, 51, 54, 58, 59, 62–65, 67–70] were finally included in the review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…After screening and eligibility assessment (Fig. 1), 44 studies [1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 14–16, 18, 19, 22, 24, 25, 27–34, 36, 37, 39, 40, 43, 44, 46, 47, 50, 51, 54, 58, 59, 62–65, 67–70] were finally included in the review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodological quality of the included studies was low. Only one non‐comparative study was considered at low risk of bias [22]; while the other 31 studies [1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 11, 14–16, 18, 25, 27–30, 33, 36, 39, 40, 43, 44, 47, 50, 51, 54, 59, 64, 67–70] were considered at high risk of bias. Two comparative studies [37, 62] resulted at low risk of bias, while 12 studies [10, 19, 24, 31, 32, 34, 46, 58, 63, 65] resulted at high risk of bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations