2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcomes of ventilation tube placement in children with cleft palate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The multiple grommet insertion rate of 23% was also almost twice as high as the background rate. Only a few previous cleft studies have included children with CL when examining grommet insertion rates (Sheahan et al, 2003;Kwan et al, 2011;Kobayashi et al, 2012). In these studies the number of children with CL ranged from seven to 62.…”
Section: Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiple grommet insertion rate of 23% was also almost twice as high as the background rate. Only a few previous cleft studies have included children with CL when examining grommet insertion rates (Sheahan et al, 2003;Kwan et al, 2011;Kobayashi et al, 2012). In these studies the number of children with CL ranged from seven to 62.…”
Section: Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,35 In the high-quality prospective cohort study by Hubbard et al, 29 children who had undergone early VTI demonstrated significantly better consonant articulation and were less likely to need speech therapy than those who had not received this treatment. The 2 retrospective studies also showed that VTI is beneficial for speech and language outcomes in children with cleft palate and OME; however, outcome differences between the VTI and non-VTI groups failed to reach significance.…”
Section: Comparative Effectiveness Of Vti For Hearing Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…No differences in speech or language development were observed between CLP children that underwent conservative observation and those that underwent aggressive VTI, over the short term (0-5 years) [44,72] or long term (8-10 years) [70,71]. Further, assessments of speech by Merrick et al revealed a similar percentage of children with normal or near-normal speech intelligibility ratings in the CLP and non-CLP groups [69].…”
Section: Summary Of Evidence On Speech and Language Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Several studies have assessed speech and language outcomes in CLP patients with OME, including prospective [60] and retrospective cohort studies [44,[69][70][71][72]. Five articles compared children that were or were not administered VTI for OME [44,60,[70][71][72].…”
Section: Vti Versus Non-vtimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation