2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00705.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical pathway audit tools: a systematic review

Abstract: It is astonishing that so little research on clinical pathway audit tools has been underwent, given the prevalent use of clinical pathways. Because the concept of clinical pathways remains unclear, a variety of audit tools are needed to help clarify the concept. Further research on the construct and criterion validity of pathway audit tools is necessary to fully understand why and under which circumstances pathways lead to improved care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
111
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Peer networks have previously been shown to facilitate patient care (15), implementation of clinical pathways (16), management of parenteral nutrition in the home setting (17), standardization of laboratory measurements (18), and management of rare chronic Objective: Evidence-based practice recommendations abound, but implementation is often unstructured and poorly audited. We assessed the ability of a peer network to implement an evidence-based best practice protocol and to measure patient outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer networks have previously been shown to facilitate patient care (15), implementation of clinical pathways (16), management of parenteral nutrition in the home setting (17), standardization of laboratory measurements (18), and management of rare chronic Objective: Evidence-based practice recommendations abound, but implementation is often unstructured and poorly audited. We assessed the ability of a peer network to implement an evidence-based best practice protocol and to measure patient outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of the clinical transition pathway was based on the principles of Vanhaecht and Sermeus (2002) (Vanhaecht et al 2006). This method consists of 11 steps in four phases: the plan-do-check-act cycle (Hoekstra et al 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All results from the patient and parent surveys were used to develop a clinical transition pathway, based on the principles of Vanhaecht and Sermeus (2002) (Vanhaecht et al 2006).…”
Section: Developing the Clinical Transition Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is envisaged that audit tools in the form of checklists will be developed to evaluate key intermediate sub-process outcomes (marked with an 'O' in the diagram) that have major impact on end patient outcomes. 38 The NGT raised issues that were novel. Most importantly for the radiography profession, the group suggested the introduction of a technical report by radiographers that together with the radiologist diagnostic report would provide a more complete documentation to the referrer and to management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%