2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81666-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical pattern of failure after a durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Abstract: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can induce durable responses in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, a significant proportion of responders still experience progressive disease after a period of response. Limited data are available on the clinical patterns of acquired resistance (AR) to ICIs. Clinical and radiologic data from 125 NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 antibodies between 2011 and 2018 at two tertiary academic institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Overall, 63 (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, all lesions during the initial radiological examination were evaluated, and patients with more than three metastatic organs or sites were found to be more likely to develop AR. The spatial distribution of progressive lesions in patients with AR, in terms of sites and number, was quite similar to that reported in those with acquired resistance to PD1/PD-L1 inhibitor [5,[21][22][23][24][25]. In both clinical scenarios, the common sites of progressive disease often occurred in the lymph nodes and lung, and the most common progressive lesion mainly occurred in the originally existing sites; meanwhile, the majority of patients had no more than three progressive lesions, indicating potential shared mechanisms regarding intra-tumoral heterogeneity and reductant immune evasion pathways in metastatic NSCLC [22,[26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In addition, all lesions during the initial radiological examination were evaluated, and patients with more than three metastatic organs or sites were found to be more likely to develop AR. The spatial distribution of progressive lesions in patients with AR, in terms of sites and number, was quite similar to that reported in those with acquired resistance to PD1/PD-L1 inhibitor [5,[21][22][23][24][25]. In both clinical scenarios, the common sites of progressive disease often occurred in the lymph nodes and lung, and the most common progressive lesion mainly occurred in the originally existing sites; meanwhile, the majority of patients had no more than three progressive lesions, indicating potential shared mechanisms regarding intra-tumoral heterogeneity and reductant immune evasion pathways in metastatic NSCLC [22,[26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In our cohort, the time to AR was approximately 7 to 8 months for either mono or combination ICIs or different primary sites, and most patients developed AR within 24.0 months. 11 , 13 , 15 Accumulating evidence suggests that dynamic cross-talk between cancer cells and the immune microenvironment is associated with the occurrence of AR. 7 Although the current mechanisms of AR are summarized as defects in tumor antigen presentation, neoantigen depletion, tumor-mediated immunosuppression or exclusion, and additional inhibitory checkpoints, the exploration of the mechanism is still far from sufficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The progression patterns of AR have been previously reported in melanoma and NSCLC but, to our knowledge, have not been explored in GI cancer. 12 , 15 , 21 In the present study, we classified the progression patterns of AR into oligoprogression and polymetastatic progression on the basis of findings from previous studies. Consistent with studies on other solid tumors, we found that the pattern of AR was predominantly oligoprogression and was associated with a good prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oligo-progression is a common phenomenon in TKItreated oncogene-addicted NSCLC (95)(96)(97), and is increasingly encountered in patients treated with ICIs (98)(99)(100). Once acquired resistance (AR) is identified, systemic treatment options include next generation TKIs or other ICIs, introduction of other biological agents targeting bypass signaling pathways leading to AR, and chemotherapy.…”
Section: Consensus 25: For Patients Who Develop Oligo-progressive Dis...mentioning
confidence: 99%