Clinical Performance and Epidemiologic Aspects of Fractured Anterior Teeth Restored with a Composite Resin: A Two‐Year Clinical Study

Vural, Uzay Koç; Kiremitçi, Arlin; Gökalp, Saadet

doi:10.1111/jopr.12645

Cited by 12 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The color alteration could be explained by composite resin water sorption. The fractures are often related with the size and location of the restoration, oftentimes due to chewing tension and lateral and protrusion movements without inadequate occlusal adjustment [16].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Composite resins are more consistent with the concept of minimally invasive dentistry compared to ceramic veneers. They are relatively easy to use, they lower clinical time without a laboratory step, and they are also cost-effective [1,13,16]. Some disadvantages of composite resins include their color instability, inherent polymerization shrinkage, increased water sorption which can lead to a decrease in wear resistance, and they can also cause post-operative hypersensitivity [1,10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment of the preferred restorative material – composite resin or ceramic – for anterior teeth restoration

Schünemann

Valmorbida

Bernardon

2019

RSBO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction and objective: To evaluate the perception of clinicians and undergraduate students concerning their preferences and experience in using composite resin and ceramic veneers to restore anterior teeth restorations. Material and methods: 60 participants including clinicians (n=30) and undergraduate students (n=30) volunteered for this study. The study consisted of two parts. Firstly, the participant answered questions about their use and possible failure of ceramic or composite resin for anterior teeth. In thesecond part, participants analyzed 3 photographs of the anterior smile and reported on the presence of healthy teeth or restored teeth, with composite resin or ceramic veneers. Results: For both groups, composite resin was frequently used over ceramic and the most important reported factor in this decision choice was the cost factor. Both groups presented a failure percentage higher than 50% for composite resin, and this percentage was higher forundergraduate students. In the visual analysis of the photographs, none of the participants identified all the restorations correctly. Conclusion: Composite resin is the most common material of choice for clinicians and undergraduate students. Distinguishing natural teeth from restored teeth has become increasingly difficult, despite the restorative material (composite resin or ceramic) used.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of the preferred restorative material – composite resin or ceramic – for anterior teeth restoration

Schünemann

Valmorbida

Bernardon

2019

RSBO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In a clinical study of fractured anterior tooth restorations with composite resin, the 24-month survival rate was 82.14% [19]. Difference in defining the treatment success could account for varied success rate among the studies.…”

Section: Reattachment Of Fractured Tooth Fragments Is a Conservativementioning

confidence: 99%

Long-Term Outcome of Reattached Tooth Fragment in Permanent Anterior Teeth of Children and Adolescents

Kang¹,

Chae²,

Lee³

et al. 2021

THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of teeth treated with reattachment technique in children and adolescents. Twenty seven permanent anterior teeth from 21 patients treated with fragment reattachment were evaluated. Clinical photos and medical records were used to assess treatment outcomes. Effect of pulp treatment and the ratio of fragment on success rate were statistically analyzed. Detachment of fragment was observed in 17 teeth, and their duration of retention was 21.41 ± 23.39 months. Repeated trauma was found to be the most frequent causes of failure. Pulp treatment before reattachment did not affect the success rate (p > 0.05). The mean ratio of fragment was 0.482 ± 0.147, and the success rate was affected by the ratio of fragment (p = 0.018). The median retention time of the teeth was 72 months if the ratio was under 0.5, and 8 months for that of the others. A significant correlation was found between the ratio of fragment and retention time (p = 0.003). Reattachment can be a predictable treatment option for crown fracture in anterior teeth in children and adolescents when a fracture involves less than 50% of the clinical crown.

show abstract

“…Resin composites are suitable for young permanent teeth as they preserve most of the healthy tooth structure [9]. With the advancement in technology, it has become convenient to imitate the natural tooth structure and morphology using resin composites, in particular, the layering techniques for direct composite resin restorations [10,11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Step-by-step teaching method: improving learning outcomes of undergraduate dental students in layering techniques for direct composite resin restorations

Yuan

Yang

et al. 2020

BMC Med Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Layering techniques for direct composite resin restorations might be complicated for inexperienced learners, as a number of materials and instruments are required at each step. The present study aimed to compare and assess the teaching effect of step-by-step and all-in-one teaching methods in layering techniques for direct composite resin restorations among undergraduate dental students. Methods A total of 68 junior dental students participated in this study, which was a prospective and single-blind trial. The students were randomly divided into a step-by-step group (experimental group, n = 34) and all-in-one group (control group, n = 34). The same teacher taught the two groups, ensuring a comparable teaching effect. The final score of each student was an average of scores by two experts who were blinded to the grouping. The scoring system was consisted by five parts. Each part was assigned scores of 3.0, 1.5, or 0. The total maximum score was 15 and minimum was 0. The total time taken by each group was also calculated. Results The values of the quality of tooth restorations evaluated by experts for step-by-step and all-in-one groups were 11.29 ± 2.13 from 15 and 9.00 ± 2.71 from 15 (t = 3.88, P < 0.001), respectively. In addition, the time spent by the experimental group was significantly lesser than that spent by the control group, which was 122.47 ± 2.82 and 137.18 ± 6.75 min, respectively (t = 11.72, p < 0.001). Conclusion With regard to the layering techniques for direct composite resin restorations, the outcomes were better in the step-by-step group than in the all-in-one group.

show abstract

Clinical Performance and Epidemiologic Aspects of Fractured Anterior Teeth Restored with a Composite Resin: A Two‐Year Clinical Study

Abstract: Within the limitations of this study, direct composite restorations were accepted as clinically satisfactory.

Cited by 12 publications

References 37 publications

Assessment of the preferred restorative material – composite resin or ceramic – for anterior teeth restoration

Assessment of the preferred restorative material – composite resin or ceramic – for anterior teeth restoration

Long-Term Outcome of Reattached Tooth Fragment in Permanent Anterior Teeth of Children and Adolescents

Step-by-step teaching method: improving learning outcomes of undergraduate dental students in layering techniques for direct composite resin restorations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About