2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical performance and sample freeze-thaw stability of the cobas®6800 SARS-CoV-2 assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in oro-/nasopharyngeal swabs and lower respiratory specimens

Abstract: Highlights Naso/oropharygeal swabs and deep respiratory samples, but not feces, show good clinical performance in Cobas®6800 SARS-CoV-2 assay. No significant difference was found after one freeze-thaw cycler with or without lysis buffer. Time-to-result is lower using Cobas®6800 SARS-CoV-2 assay compared to LDA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When analysing qRT-PCR results, a cut-off point of cycle threshold ( Ct ) ≥ 35 was set for a negative sample. 34,35,28…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When analysing qRT-PCR results, a cut-off point of cycle threshold ( Ct ) ≥ 35 was set for a negative sample. 34,35,28…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of samples from the positive sample group were obtained from symptomatic individuals (96.6%) and also contained all of the discordant results. Finally, our retrospective study required freezing and thawing of specimens, potentially resulting in degradation of viral nucleic acids and rupturing of virions causing initially positive specimens to provide false negative results [26] . This could especially impact samples with viral target levels at or below the LOD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think this is unlikely (1) because prolonged storage at −80°C with a single freeze-thaw cycle has generally not been considered deleterious to detection of enveloped RNA viruses from nasopharyngeal specimens 16 and (2) because a recent evaluation of a single freeze-thaw cycle on SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection using the same assay resulted in 0 of 66 positive samples converting to negative and only 4 of 66 (6%) converting to inconclusive. 17 Finally, household exposure risk may vary over time, as may adherence to infection control recommendations from public health authorities. The NPV was estimated from a sample of HCWs studied during a period when schools and businesses were closed, possibly lowering the risk of household exposure during self-isolation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%