2021
DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Performance Assessment of a New Active Osseointegrated Implant System in Mixed Hearing Loss: Results From a Prospective Clinical Investigation

Abstract: Objective: Evaluation of a new active osseointegrated bone-conduction hearing implant in moderate to severe mixed-hearing loss. Study Design: Prospective observational study of a series of cases. Setting: Tertial referral center. Patients: Twenty patients with moderate mixed-hearing loss were evaluated (10 Cochlear Osia group and 10 Baha 5 Power Connect -control group). Intervention: Rehabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Passive transcutaneous BCIs face limitations as the skin and subcutaneous tissue can attenuate the vibration (14,19). In comparison, active transcutaneous systems can transmit high-frequency sounds more efficiently (20). This is congruent with our results which showed excellent postoperative speech audiometry and improvements in speech reception threshold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Passive transcutaneous BCIs face limitations as the skin and subcutaneous tissue can attenuate the vibration (14,19). In comparison, active transcutaneous systems can transmit high-frequency sounds more efficiently (20). This is congruent with our results which showed excellent postoperative speech audiometry and improvements in speech reception threshold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Mylanus et al showed significant improvements in speech recognition and patient-reported outcomes following Osia implantation compared to the patient's Baha Softband (14). Another recent prospective trial by Pla-Gil et al compared Osia to Baha Power Connect found comparable performance in speech recognition (20). The Osia system was found to have greater mid- and high-frequency gains compared to the control group (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osia does also provide a benefit for speech recognition in noise [ 4 , 8 ]. Subjective evaluation using the SSQ, APHAB, and HUI showed benefit for Osia recipients [ 8 , 11 13 ], and our long-term data revealed the largest benefit at > 36 months of Osia experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Gawecki et al (2020) showed higher speech recognition scores as well as larger self-reported QoL with the Osia compared to the Baha Attract [11], while Pla-Gil et al (2021) compared a control group of ten patients using a Baha 5 Power Connect with a group of 10 Osia 1 patients and found a comparable hearing performance in terms of both audiological and subjective outcomes [13]. As a consequence, Osia can be regarded as similarly effective treatment to other percutaneous BAHS with the highest audiological output, and as superior to other transcutaneous bone conduction devices (Ellsperman et al (2021) provided an overview [14]).…”
Section: Audiometric Benefit Advantage At Higher Frequencies and Improvement In Speech Recognition With The Osia System Comes Along With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the software, quantize the audio signal and preemphasize the processing, calculate the ratio between the frame shift distance and the length of each frame, obtain the analog signal conversion frequency and the basic unit quantization index, construct the speech text decoder based on the continuous hidden Markov model, calculate the width of the window function, obtain the Markov chain probability path in the grid, compare the complexity of different probability paths, design the English translation robot speech recognition algorithm, and get the speech recognition results of English translation robot. From the experimental data, it can be seen that the speech recognition accuracy of this system is above 75% under three different audio qualities, which is more stable than other systems, and the accuracy is higher under the same audio quality, which shows that the speech recognition system with the continuous hidden Markov model is better than other systems [21].…”
Section: Speech Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 83%