Clinical performance of indirect composite onlays and overlays: 2-year follow up

Özsoy, Alev; Kuşdemir, Mahmut; Öztürk-Bozkurt, Funda; Akalın, Tuğba Toz; Özcan, Mutlu

doi:10.1080/01694243.2016.1162460

Cited by 5 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Eight full text articles were selected using electronic databases and 20 further were retrieved throughout manual search. From the 25 studies included in the meta-analysis, 12 studies were randomized controlled trial, 14 prospective and 2 retrospectives (Krejci et al 1992; Taskonak et al 2006; Frankenberger et al 2008; Frankenberger et al 2009; Dukic et al 2010; Fasbinder et al 2010; Manhart et al 2010; Azevedo et al 2012; Esuivel-Opshaw et al 2012; Murgueitio et al 2012; Schenke et al 2012; Taschner et al 2012; Gehrt et al 2013; Reich et al 2013; Akin et al 2014; D’all’Orologio et al 2014; Dhima et al 2014; Guess et al 2014; Guess et al 2014; Selz et al 2014; Seydler et al 2015; Baader et al 2016; Botto et al 2016; Mittal et al 2016; Özsoy et al 2016; Santos et al 2016; Rauch et al 2018) [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Performance of Partial and Full-Coverage Fixed Dental Restorations Fabricated from Hybrid Polymer and Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Husain

Özcan

Molinero‐Mourelle

et al. 2020

JCM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical performance of tooth-borne partial and full-coverage fixed dental prosthesis fabricated using hybrid polymer and ceramic CAD/CAM materials regarding their biologic, technical and esthetical outcomes. PICOS search strategy was applied using MEDLINE and were searched for RCTs and case control studies by two reviewers using MeSH Terms. Bias risk was evaluated using the Cochrane collaboration tool and Newcastle–Ottawa assessment scale. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the mean long-term survival difference of both materials at two different periods (≤24, ≥36 months(m)). Mean differences in biologic, technical and esthetical complications of partial vs. full crown reconstructions were analyzed using software package R (p < 0.05). 28 studies included in the systematic review and 25 studies in the meta-analysis. The overall survival rate was 99% (0.95–1.00, ≤24 m) and dropped to 95% (0.87–0.98, ≥36 m), while the overall success ratio was 88% (0.54–0.98; ≤24 m) vs. 77% (0.62–0.88; ≥36 m). No significance, neither for the follow-up time points, nor for biologic, technical and esthetical (88% vs. 77%; 90% vs. 74%; 96% vs. 95%) outcomes was overserved. A significance was found for the technical/clinical performance between full 93% (0.88–0.96) and partial 64% (0.34–0.86) crowns. The biologic success rate of partial crowns with 69% (0.42–0.87) was lower, but not significant compared to 91% (0.79–0.97) of full crowns. The esthetical success rate of partial crowns with 90% (0.65–0.98) was lower, but not significant compared to 99% (0.92–1.00) of full crowns.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Performance of Partial and Full-Coverage Fixed Dental Restorations Fabricated from Hybrid Polymer and Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Husain

Özcan

Molinero‐Mourelle

et al. 2020

JCM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From many studies, it has been found that this material has very good physicomechanical properties, such as high strength, wear-resistance, and superior polishability for such restorations. 10,22,23 In this clinical study, at the 3-year and 6-year follow-up, the success rate of the restorations was 100% without failure. At a 9-year follow-up, the success rate was 85% and the failure rate was 15%.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 58%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These results could be related to the resin composite luting cement, which considered as the weakest point for these kinds of restorations. 11,18,19,22,25 Because adhesive inlays and Clinical Longevity of Indirect Resin Inlays and Onlays Galiatsatos et al…”

Section: Requested An Improvementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4,19,[28][29][30][31][32] Several clinical studies on indirect composite resins inlays and onlays reported no failure or low failure rates. 11,18,19,21,22 In a 12-year study of clinical performance of one-two and multisurface composite resin inlays on premolars and molars, the failure rate was only 12%. 19 In another study, after 3 years of clinical service, 93% of the composite inlays in posterior teeth showed satisfactory results.…”

Section: Requested An Improvementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Clinical Longevity of Indirect Composite Resin Inlays and Onlays: An Up to 9-Year Prospective Study

Galiatsatos

Bergou³

2021

Eur J Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective This clinical study evaluated the clinical performance of composite resin inlays and onlays over 9 years. Materials and Methods Sixty composite resin inlays and onlays were placed in 32 patients, aged 20 to 60 years, by a single operator using the same clinical procedure. The restorations were examined for fracture rate; esthetics; and patient acceptance and marginal integrity, including caries, marginal discoloration, tooth integrity, and surface texture. All restorations were evaluated at the time of placement and 3, 6, and 9 years after placement by using the modified U.S. Public Health Service criteria. Results At the 3-year follow-up, an Alpha score was given to 88.4% of restorations, while a Bravo score was given to the remaining 11.6%. There was not any failure. At the 6-year follow-up, the success rate of the restorations was 100% without failure. None of the restorations was scored with Delta (D). An Alpha score was given to 60% of the restorations, a Bravo score was assigned to 35%, and a Charlie score was 5% of the restorations. Overall, the success rate of the restorations at 9-year follow-up was 85% and the failure rate was 15%. An Alpha score was given to 15% of the restorations, a Bravo score was given to 50%, a Charlie score was assigned to 20%, and a D score was given to 15% of the restorations. Conclusion Indirect resin composite inlays and onlays showed acceptable long-term clinical results. The success rate of the restorations at 9-year follow-up was 85% and the failure rate was 15%.

show abstract

Microshear Bond Strength of Indirect Composite Resin After Different Surface Treatments (In-Vitro Study)

Sadek

Abdel-Fattah

Afifi

2022

Alexandria Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTION:An essential part in the successful clinical specifications of any indirect restoration is bond strength. Several surface treatments might be used to improve bond strength between resin cement and indirect composite restorations. OBJECTIVES:The purpose of the study was to evaluate microshear bond strength of two different types of indirect composite resin after different surface treatments before cementation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: sixty cylindrical specimens were prepared from two types of indirect composite and divided into 2 groups (n=30). Group A: SR NEXCO (Ivoclar Vivadent AGS chaan, Liechtenstein) and Group B: Gradia Plus Indirect composite (GC, Tokyo, Japan).A polyethylene tube was used to prepare specimens with dimensions (2 mm length and 1 mm width).Composite specimens were precured for 20 seconds by Light Emitting Diode curing unit and the secondary curing was done inside a Photopol pro vacuum light cure box for Gradia Plus for 3 minutes and 11 minutes for SR NEXCO. After secondary curing each main group was subdivided into three subgroups according to their surface treatment: subgroup 1A (sandblasting by aluminum oxide particles followed by silane), subgroup 2A (sandblasting by aluminum oxide particles + Hydrofluric acid etching+silane) and subgroup 3A (sandblasting by aluminum oxide particles + MONOBOND Etch and prime) same surface treatments were used at subgroups 1B,2B&3B respectively. The treated composite specimens were cemented to a flat dentin surface of 10 molar teeth six samples on each tooth (three samples from each group) using G-CEM LINKACE TM (GC, Tokyo, Japan). All the specimens were thermocycled for 500 cycles from 5 to 55C, and then microshear bond strength test was done in a Universal Testing Machine 0.5 mm/min (Instron model3345, England).The mode of failure determined under stereomicroscope. RESULTS: Statistical significant difference was noticed between subgroup 1A which was significantly higher than subgroup 2A (p=0.043) and subgroup 3A (p=0.013). Moreover, subgroup 1B recorded significantly higher microshear bond strength values than subgroup 2B (p1=0.002) and subgroup 3B (p2=0.044). Mixed failures were more prominent in subgroup 1A, 1B and 3B while adhesive failures were more prominent in other subgroups except for 2B half of the failures were adhesive and the other half mixed. CONCLUSION: Sandblasted subgroups with aluminum oxide particles followed by silane recorded the greatest microshear bond strength values regardless of the type of composite.

show abstract

Clinical performance of indirect composite onlays and overlays: 2-year follow up

Cited by 5 publications

References 34 publications

Clinical Performance of Partial and Full-Coverage Fixed Dental Restorations Fabricated from Hybrid Polymer and Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Clinical Performance of Partial and Full-Coverage Fixed Dental Restorations Fabricated from Hybrid Polymer and Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Clinical Longevity of Indirect Composite Resin Inlays and Onlays: An Up to 9-Year Prospective Study

Microshear Bond Strength of Indirect Composite Resin After Different Surface Treatments (In-Vitro Study)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About