2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-03002-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical performance of Xpert Bladder Cancer (BC) Monitor, a mRNA-based urine test, in active surveillance (AS) patients with recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): results from the Bladder Cancer Italian Active Surveillance (BIAS) project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also proposed that in this setting, the LDA total cut-off would be 0.4. 17 Our data shows that sensitivities of the XBC for predicting positive or suspicious cystoscopic results is considerably higher than for VUC (75.0% vs. 41.2% respectively), and also NPV is improved in comparison to VUC (93.0% vs. 85.4% respectively). The results are comparable to the results of the studies of Van Valenberg et al and Pichler et al (74 % and 84% for sensitivity and 93% and 93% for NPV respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…They also proposed that in this setting, the LDA total cut-off would be 0.4. 17 Our data shows that sensitivities of the XBC for predicting positive or suspicious cystoscopic results is considerably higher than for VUC (75.0% vs. 41.2% respectively), and also NPV is improved in comparison to VUC (93.0% vs. 85.4% respectively). The results are comparable to the results of the studies of Van Valenberg et al and Pichler et al (74 % and 84% for sensitivity and 93% and 93% for NPV respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…blood cells) [21,22]. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Due to their lack of specificity or sensitivity, these tests are not widely used in routine laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of commercially available urinary molecular markers have been introduced for initial diagnosis and detection of tumor recurrence for the follow-up of NMIBC patients. These non-invasive tests include the measurement of markers such as MCM5 protein (ADXBLADDER test, sensitivity/specificity of 76%/69%, $52 per test), 15 DNA methylation patterns (Bladder Epicheck test, overall sensitivity of 67% with 40%/89% in low-/high-risk and specificity 88%, not yet marketed), bladder tumor associated antigen (BTA, sensitivity/specificity of 58%-71%/73%, $40 per test), proteins detected on fixed urothelial cells (ImmunoCyt, sensitivity/specificity of 67%-86%/75%-79%, $200 per test), nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22, sensitivity/specificity of 71%-73%/73%-80%, $25 per test), chromosomal aberrations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (UroVysion, sensitivity/ specificity of 72%/83%, $800 per test), gene expression levels of five targets (ABL1, CRH, IGF2, UPK1B, ANXA10) by RT-PCR (Xpert BC Monitor, overall sensitivity 46% with 40%/86% in low-/high-risk and specificity 90%, $165 per test) [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. However, due to their limited specificities or sensitivities, the markers proposed to date have not been widely adopted in daily clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%