1994
DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199427030-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Pharmacokinetic Advantages of New Drug Delivery Methods for the Treatment of Liver Tumours

Abstract: Response rates following systemic chemotherapy for hepatic tumours are disappointing. The drugs used have a narrow therapeutic ratio, which limit the scope for dose escalation of these potentially toxic agents. Therefore, alternative delivery methods that optimise the efficacy of currently available cytotoxic agents have been explored. Several novel approaches have attempted to 'target' treatment so that it reaches the tumour whilst minimising systemic exposure. There is some evidence to suggest that certain a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, an appropriate animal model in which only the liver is damaged is required to estimate the precise effects of hepatic disorder on drug disposition. Marked progress has been made in drug delivery techniques, 9,10) and their utilization for animal model preparation is expected to reduce damage to nontarget organs. However, to date there have been no reports of the application of such methods for this purpose.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an appropriate animal model in which only the liver is damaged is required to estimate the precise effects of hepatic disorder on drug disposition. Marked progress has been made in drug delivery techniques, 9,10) and their utilization for animal model preparation is expected to reduce damage to nontarget organs. However, to date there have been no reports of the application of such methods for this purpose.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the intraperitoneal administration of liver cancer chemotherapy, the drug solution is expected to distribute preferentially around the diseased region in the liver. Although intravenous, hepatic arterial and portal administration have been attempted as targeted delivery methods (Anderson et al 1994), the administered drug tends to distribute through the entire liver. We have shown previously that direct injection into an organ is not suitable for site-selective drug delivery to the liver with a high blood flow, since directly injected drugs are rapidly cleared from the injection site and enter the systemic circulation (Nishida et al 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hepatic metastases from a variety of primary human tumours occur with high frequency, and their presence is usually associated with a low response rate to conventional systemic chemotherapy (Anderson et al, 1994). Efforts to establish innovative drug delivery strategies that improve the efficacy of anti-cancer agents against liver metastases, therefore, are not only desirable but may also produce clinical results more rapidly than the development of new chemical entities (Kim, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to establish innovative drug delivery strategies that improve the efficacy of anti-cancer agents against liver metastases, therefore, are not only desirable but may also produce clinical results more rapidly than the development of new chemical entities (Kim, 1993). Portal vein or hepatic artery infusion of a cytotoxic agent (Anderson et al, 1994), encapsulation of drugs in liposomes (Kim, 1993;Anderson et al, 1994) and livertargeted erythrocytes (Zocchi et al, 1989) are examples of recently employed attempts to increase the anti-tumour efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents against metastatic liver neoplasms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%