ObjectiveTo characterise the current clinical practice patterns regarding the use of magnesium sulphate (MgSO
4) for eclampsia prevention and treatment in a multi‐country network of health facilities and compare with international recommendations.DesignCross‐sectional survey.SettingA total of 147 health facilities in 15 countries across Africa, Latin America and Asia.PopulationHeads of obstetric departments or maternity units.MethodsAnonymous online and paper‐based survey conducted in 2015.Main outcome measuresAvailability and use of MgSO
4; availability of a formal clinical protocol for MgSO
4 administration; and MgSO
4 dosing regimens for eclampsia prevention and treatment.ResultsMagnesium sulphate and a formal protocol for its administration were reported to be always available in 87.4% and 86.4% of all facilities, respectively. MgSO
4 was used for the treatment of mild pre‐eclampsia, severe pre‐eclampsia and eclampsia in 24.3%, 93.5% and 96.4% of all facilities, respectively. Regarding the treatment of severe pre‐eclampsia, 26.4% and 7.0% of all facilities reported using dosing regimens that were consistent with Zuspan and Pritchard regimens, respectively. Across regions, intramuscular maintenance regimens were more commonly used in the African region (45.7%) than in the Latin American (3.0%) and Asian (22.9%) regions, whereas intravenous maintenance regimens were more often used in the Latin American (94.0%) and Asian (60.0%) regions than in the African region (21.7%). Similar patterns were found for the treatment of eclampsia across regions.ConclusionsThe reported clinical use of MgSO
4 for eclampsia prevention and treatment varied widely, and was largely inconsistent with current international recommendations.Tweetable abstractMgSO
4 regimens for eclampsia prevention and treatment in many hospitals are inconsistent with international recommendations.