1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00684852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical pharmacokinetics of mitoxantrone after intraperitoneal administration

Abstract: The pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected mitoxantrone was determined in plasma and peritoneal dialysate taken from five patients presenting with cancer confined to the peritoneal cavity over a sampling period of 1 week. The drug was given through a Tenckhoff catheter as a 15-min infusion and the peritoneal dialysate was removed after a dwell time of 4 h; the doses delivered varied between 20 and 50 mg/m2. Dose-limiting local toxicity was moderate. The HPLC technique used for mitoxantrone deter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratios of drug AUC in the peritoneal cavity and AUC in systemic blood are 12 for cisplatin, 10 for carboplatin, 65 for melphalan, 65 for etoposide, 75 for mitomycin C, 367 for 5-fluorouracil, 500 for doxorubicin, 915 for mitoxantrone and 1000 for paclitaxel dissolved in Cremophor EL ® (BASF Corp., Germany)/ethanol [32–38]. However, the ratios between drug concentrations in tumors and plasma are much lower; IP treatments of cis-platin in animals yielded two- to three-times higher concentrations in tumor periphery, but no improvement in tumor center, compared with intravenous treatments [39,40].…”
Section: Pk Rationale Of Ip Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ratios of drug AUC in the peritoneal cavity and AUC in systemic blood are 12 for cisplatin, 10 for carboplatin, 65 for melphalan, 65 for etoposide, 75 for mitomycin C, 367 for 5-fluorouracil, 500 for doxorubicin, 915 for mitoxantrone and 1000 for paclitaxel dissolved in Cremophor EL ® (BASF Corp., Germany)/ethanol [32–38]. However, the ratios between drug concentrations in tumors and plasma are much lower; IP treatments of cis-platin in animals yielded two- to three-times higher concentrations in tumor periphery, but no improvement in tumor center, compared with intravenous treatments [39,40].…”
Section: Pk Rationale Of Ip Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraperitoneal therapy has been under development for several decades; most clinical studies were conducted in patients with ovarian or gastrointestinal cancer [32–38]. IP therapy has been administered in various settings.…”
Section: Clinical Research On Ip Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IP therapy has been under development for several decades and has shown survival benefits in selected patient groups (5,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Most studies, conducted in patients with ovarian or gastrointestinal cancer, used IP therapy preoperatively to downstage the disease to facilitate surgical debulking and intraoperatively and postoperatively to treat residual small and microscopic tumors (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36). Hyperthermia intraoperative IP chemotherapy, where the drug solution (e.g., cisplatin, mitomycin C) is heated to 41-43°C to enhance drug uptake and antitumor efficacy, has also been used.…”
Section: Part I Peritoneal Cancer and Intraperitoneal Cancer Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, others have concluded that mitoxantrone is worthy of further exploration reassessments were documented in a small number of patients. Encouraging therapeutic results have been observed given alone [17][18][19][20][21][22] or in combination with interferon-a [23]. A negative report with the intraperitoneal administra-with this drug by the ip route in other settings [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%