2017
DOI: 10.16943/ptinsa/2017/49233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Pharmacology in India-A Systematic Review of Research in the Past 5 Years

Abstract: The Indian National Science Academy has published two Status Reports on Pharmacological Research (1984 & 2000). The International Council for Science (ICSU) National Committee for Pharmacology has commissioned the third status report on Pharmacological Research in India covering the last 5 years. This systematic review covers the status of research in Clinical Pharmacology (excluding pharmacogenomics, pharmacovigilance, pharmaco-economics). We searched PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar to extract published art… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it could not be started due to paucity of funds. The need for an institute was again reiterated in a review of clinical pharmacology research in India 7 for developing products for Indian population and rational use of medicines. Furthermore, it was noted that drug development in academia and Government funded institutions is hampered by inadequate trained manpower, lack of interaction between industry and academia/public research institutions 8 9 , and between basic sciences and clinical researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it could not be started due to paucity of funds. The need for an institute was again reiterated in a review of clinical pharmacology research in India 7 for developing products for Indian population and rational use of medicines. Furthermore, it was noted that drug development in academia and Government funded institutions is hampered by inadequate trained manpower, lack of interaction between industry and academia/public research institutions 8 9 , and between basic sciences and clinical researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%