Clinical photography vs digital video clips for the assessment of smile esthetics

Schabel, Brian J.; Baccetti, Tiziano; Franchi, Lorenzo; McNamara, James A.

doi:10.2319/052207-243.1

Cited by 43 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It has been noted that standardized digital videography provides the clinician with a wider range of images for selecting the parameters of lip-tooth relationship during facial animation, and that it is possible to select matching images at different time points from these multiple frame galleries to effectively compare the “same” posed social smile. Undeniably, error is associated with selection of the appropriate still frame representing the posed social smile; similarly, a photograph taken of the smile has error associated with it 28. Schabel et al28 found that there is no clinically significant difference between the images of smiles of subjects captured by clinical photography and the smiles of the same subjects obtained from digital video clips.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors affecting smile esthetics in adults with different types of anterior overjet malocclusion

Cheng

2017

Korean J Orthod

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThis study aimed to quantitatively assess the relationship of smile esthetic variables with various types of malocclusion, and identify the cephalometric factors affecting smile measurements.MethodsThis retrospective study included 106 patients who were treated with retention at the orthodontic department of Taipei Medical University Hospital. Hard-tissue variables were measured using lateral cephalographic tracings, and nine smile esthetic variables were measured using facial photographs. The patients were divided into three groups according to their overjet (< 0, 0–4, and > 4 mm). An analysis of variance was conducted to compare the pretreatment cephalometric variables and smile esthetic variables among the three groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify the cephalometric factors affecting the smile measurements in each group.ResultsExcept the upper midline and buccal corridor ratio, all of the smile measurements differed significantly among the three groups before orthodontic treatment. Some of the smile characteristics were correlated with the cephalometric measurements in different types of malocclusion. The overjet was the major factor influencing the smile pattern in all three types of malocclusion.ConclusionsSmile characteristics differ between different types of malocclusion; the smile may be influenced by skeletal pattern, dental procumbency, or facial type. These findings indicate that establishment of an optimal horizontal anterior teeth relationship is the key to improving the smile characteristics in different types of malocclusion.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors affecting smile esthetics in adults with different types of anterior overjet malocclusion

Cheng

2017

Korean J Orthod

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Another possible criticism might be that obtaining a valid and reproducible smiling image on a single photographic image might be difficult (Ackerman and Ackerman, 2002); however Schabel and colleagues (Schabel et al, 2010) have shown that smile assessments undertaken from standard digital photographs are similar to those obtained from a captured digital video clip.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Space closing versus space opening for bilateral missing upper laterals – aesthetic judgments of laypeople: a web-based survey

Qadri¹,

Parkin

Benson³

2016

Journal of Orthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To investigate the opinions of laypeople regarding the aesthetic outcome of treating patients with developmental absence of both maxillary lateral incisors with either orthodontic space closure (OSC) or space opening and prosthetic replacement (PR). Design:Cross sectional, web-based survey.Methods: A panel of five orthodontists and five restorative dentists examined the post-treatment intra-oral images of 21 patients with developmental absence of both upper lateral incisors. A consensus view was obtained about the 10 most attractive images (5 OSC; 5 PR). The 10 selected images were used in a web-based survey involving staff and students at the University of Sheffield.In the first section the participants were asked to evaluate the attractiveness of the 10 randomly arranged single images using a 5-point Likert scale. In the second section an image of OSC was paired with an image of PR according to their attractiveness ranking by the clinician panel, and the participants were asked to indicate which of the two images they preferred. Results:The survey received 959 completed responses with 9590 judgements. The images of OSC were perceived to be more attractive (mean rating 3.34 out of 5; sd 0.56) compared with the images of PR (mean rating 3.14 out of 5; sd 0.58) (mean diff 0.21; P<0.001). Female and staff judges tended to give higher attractiveness ratings. Both females and males preferred the OSC images closing in 3 out of 4 paired images. Conclusion:Space closing was perceived to be more attractive than space opening by lay people.The findings have implications for advising patients about the best aesthetic outcome when both maxillary lateral incisors are missing.

show abstract

“…The lack of standardization and the inability to capture images accurately are 2 limiting factors. 33,34 Photography was expected to produce results similar to this study. However, videography might have an additional diagnostic value when patients' oral functions are evaluated.…”

Section: Maxillary Anterior Overjetmentioning

confidence: 52%

Qualitative evaluation of pretreatment patient concerns in orthodontics

Twigge

Roberts

Jamieson

et al. 2016

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clinical photography vs digital video clips for the assessment of smile esthetics

Cited by 43 publications

References 7 publications

Factors affecting smile esthetics in adults with different types of anterior overjet malocclusion

Factors affecting smile esthetics in adults with different types of anterior overjet malocclusion

Space closing versus space opening for bilateral missing upper laterals – aesthetic judgments of laypeople: a web-based survey

Qualitative evaluation of pretreatment patient concerns in orthodontics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About