During the past decade, unprecedented clinical and research resources have been directed toward addressing 2 conditions considered "silent" and "signature injuries" of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, namely, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and concussion ( m i l d t r a u m a t i c b r a i n injury). This investment is increasingly paying dividends in knowledge and interventions that are changing the standards of clinical practice. Notable examples include emerging trauma-focused psychotherapies and the antihypertensive prazosin hydrochloride for PTSD. 1 However, along with these successes have also come seemingly promising interventions that in due course are shown to lack efficacy when tested in clinical trials such as the multicenter trial of risperidone augmentation for PTSD. 1 This issue of JAMA Internal Medicine publishes results of a clinical trial that illuminates the challenges in designing effective interventions for silent war-related injuries. 2 While the sample size was modest, this unique well-designed 3-arm double-blind study of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) treatment provides compelling results with broad implications. Seventytwo service members who experienced concussions (including at least 1 concussion during war-zone deployment) and were having persistent postconcussion symptoms (â„4 months' duration) were randomized to receive 40 HBO treatments (100% oxygen at 1.5 atmospheres absolute for 60 minutes 5 days per week), a sham procedure (40 equivalent sessions involving slightly pressurized room air, sufficient to induce a feeling of inner ear pressure), or routine postconcussion care. Results showed that both the HBO and sham procedures were associated with significant improvements in postconcussion symptoms and secondary outcomes, including PTSD (which most participants had), depression, sleep quality, satisfaction with life, and physical, cognitive, and mental health functioning. However, there were no significant differences between HBO and the sham procedure, and change scores for all secondary outcomes favored sham.Although this trial was technically a pilot investigation designed to produce data necessary for a pivotal study and will not likely end debate on this topic (given tenacious advocacy by HBO proponents 3 ), these results are consistent with 2 other sham-controlled clinical trials among service members and veterans involving a range of HBO doses. 2 Given the outstanding methods, consistency in results, and lack of dose response across these studies, it is increasingly hard to argue that a phase 3 trial of HBO for the treatment of postconcussion symptoms (or PTSD) is warranted.