Clinical practice guidelines within the Southern African development community: a descriptive study of the quality of guideline development and concordance with best evidence for five priority diseases

Abstract

BackgroundReducing the burden of disease relies on availability of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). There is limited data on availability, quality and content of guidelines within the Southern African Development Community (SADC). This evaluation aims to address this gap in knowledge and provide recommendations for regional guideline development.MethodsWe prioritised five diseases: HIV in adults, malaria in children and adults, pre-eclampsia, diarrhoea in children and hypertension in primary care. A comprehensive electronic search to locate guidelines was conducted between June and October 2010 and augmented with email contact with SADC Ministries of Health. Independent reviewers used the AGREE II tool to score six quality domains reporting the guideline development process. Alignment of the evidence-base of the guidelines was evaluated by comparing their content with key recommendations from accepted reference guidelines, identified with a content expert, and percentage scores were calculated.FindingsWe identified 30 guidelines from 13 countries, publication dates ranging from 2003-2010. Overall the 'scope and purpose' and 'clarity and presentation' domains of the AGREE II instrument scored highest, median 58%(range 19-92) and 83%(range 17-100) respectively. 'Stakeholder involvement' followed with median 39%(range 6-75). 'Applicability', 'rigour of development' and 'editorial independence' scored poorly, all below 25%. Alignment with evidence was variable across member states, the lowest scores occurring in older guidelines or where the guideline being evaluated was part of broader primary healthcare CPG rather than a disease-specific guideline.ConclusionThis review identified quality gaps and variable alignment with best evidence in available guidelines within SADC for five priority diseases. Future guideline development processes within SADC should better adhere to global reporting norms requiring broader consultation of stakeholders and transparency of process. A regional guideline support committee could harness local capacity to support context appropriate guideline development.

South African Guidelines Excellence (SAGE): Clinical practice guidelines - quality and credibility

“…[1][2][3] With the emergence of international collaborations such as the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N), [4] there have been concerted attempts to standardise CPG writing practices across countries, to increase the credibility of the final products. [5][6][7] Without adherence to rigorous guideline development and reporting standards, the considerable time and effort put into developing guidelines may be wasted, as intended users may not have confidence in the recommendations made.…”

“…However, there is room for improvement if SA CPG activities are to match global standards. [7] In April 2014, the SAMJ signalled on its website the appointment of an editorial subcommittee whose specific mandate would be to review guidelines submitted for publication. The SAMJ has regularly published guidelines and recommendations for the management of a variety of conditions.…”

Paid staff or volunteers – does it make a difference? The impact of staffing on child outcomes for children attending community-based programmes in South Africa and Malawi

“…In most cases, CHWs in low-income contexts are poor and usually female [57,58]. Expecting economically marginalised women to provide health and welfare services to others, without remuneration, has been argued to amount to labour exploitation [24,59].…”

Better Drug Therapy for the Children of Africa: Current Impediments to Success and Potential Strategies for Improvement

“…It has been shown that implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines is effective in reducing antimicrobial resistance and hospital-acquired infections when used appropriately [66]. A survey on use of inpatient treatment guidelines for HIV in adults, malaria in children and adults, pre-eclampsia, diarrhea in children, and hypertension in the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) identified substantial gaps in quality of evidence in available guidelines and the extent to which they were implemented [67]. These findings are consistent with the reality that most health facilities in Africa have not yet adopted standard treatment guidelines and, even where they exist, adherence may prove to be very low.…”