2012
DOI: 10.1177/1039856212460599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Practice Improvement Payments: incentives for delivery of quality care

Abstract: The results suggest that the implementation of incentive payments for routine clinical work in mental health can assist with state-wide service improvement. The impact of target setting and supporting activities remains unclear and improvements appeared to be robust to administrative challenges and unexpected external events.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To mitigate this, the Queensland Mental Health Alcohol and Other Drugs Branch has incorporated these smoking clinical indicators into statewide Key Performance Indicators for MHS. This strategy has proved successful in sustaining improvements in other clinical practice change interventions supported by the MHCC (Plever et al, 2012). This review did not examine the impact of the Quality Improvement Payment to MHS results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To mitigate this, the Queensland Mental Health Alcohol and Other Drugs Branch has incorporated these smoking clinical indicators into statewide Key Performance Indicators for MHS. This strategy has proved successful in sustaining improvements in other clinical practice change interventions supported by the MHCC (Plever et al, 2012). This review did not examine the impact of the Quality Improvement Payment to MHS results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change meant that for the first time MHS could not seek exemptions for designated smoking areas and needed to consider how to implement statewide smokefree healthcare. The Queensland Mental Health Clinical Collaborative (MHCC) was considered a method to support the embedding of smoking care into routine clinical practice with demonstrated success in statewide practice change (Plever et al, 2010(Plever et al, , 2012(Plever et al, , 2016. The methodology underpinning the MHCC is based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Model (Ovretveit et al, 2002) that has been adapted to meet the needs of Queensland MHS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All services were members of the MHCC and had engaged in similar service improvement activities documented elsewhere. 12,13 Services used pseudonyms to de-identify the reporting of site information which have been used to report this data. All consumers were open to a community mental health service included in the study during the reference periods.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%