2019
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical practice workflow in Radiation Oncology should be highly standardized

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve the first point it is necessary to limit the extent of non‐value‐adding activities and to appoint a person in charge of each sub process to improve throughput [ 6 ]. In addition, radiotherapy is a modality of treatment that needs several steps and where clinical practice workflows should be highly standardized [ 7 ]. So, we can state that the time reduction we achieved in the contouring process has primarily been a consequence of the acquired experience in automatic contouring and the use of templates (for structure creation and beam configuration).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve the first point it is necessary to limit the extent of non‐value‐adding activities and to appoint a person in charge of each sub process to improve throughput [ 6 ]. In addition, radiotherapy is a modality of treatment that needs several steps and where clinical practice workflows should be highly standardized [ 7 ]. So, we can state that the time reduction we achieved in the contouring process has primarily been a consequence of the acquired experience in automatic contouring and the use of templates (for structure creation and beam configuration).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While understanding our management systems, performing QA programs, establishing standardization procedures, and participating in voluntary internal/external audits are the preventive measures. 11,13,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The proactive risk assessment, reactive risk analysis, review of reported adverse events, and establishing reporting and learning systems are other important measures adopted in managing errors as described. 14,[26][27][28] Error reporting and learning systems form the backbone of most modern RT centers and associations to constantly learn and improve the safety and quality of patient care and are described further in detail here.…”
Section: Context Key Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clear position from the participants was that use of the strap should be at professional discretion. Standardisation is a strong feature of radiotherapy, 23 however universal application of the strap has created tension with the application of EBP through decision-making informed by professional experience. The two patient groups perceived to derive most benefit from the strap were those with dementia/cognitive impairment followed by paediatric patients.…”
Section: Perception Of Purpose(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%