2015
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.114.006910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Prediction Algorithm (BRAIN) to Determine Risk of Hematoma Growth in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Abstract: , >5=0) predicted the probability of ICH growth (ranging from 3.4% for 0 point to 85.8% for 24 points) with good discrimination (C-statistic, 0.73) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P=0.82) in INTERACT1. Conclusions-The simple BRAIN score predicts the probability of hematoma growth in ICH. This could be used to improve risk stratification for research and clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00226096 and NCT00716079.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
68
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the hemorrhage also induces a series of biochemical events that include activation of the coagulation cascade, formation of hemoglobin breakdown products, oxidative stress, inflammation and blood-brain barrier permeability, and all of them contribute to the formation of perihematomal edema and secondary injury (11). The edema then can increase the intracranial pressure (ICP) and thus induce additional brain injury in the surrounding parenchyma (16). It is widely known that the supratentorial ICH is commonly accompanied by headache and vomiting as a result of the increased intracranial pressure and meningismus caused by the blood flow in the ventricles of the brain (17,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the hemorrhage also induces a series of biochemical events that include activation of the coagulation cascade, formation of hemoglobin breakdown products, oxidative stress, inflammation and blood-brain barrier permeability, and all of them contribute to the formation of perihematomal edema and secondary injury (11). The edema then can increase the intracranial pressure (ICP) and thus induce additional brain injury in the surrounding parenchyma (16). It is widely known that the supratentorial ICH is commonly accompanied by headache and vomiting as a result of the increased intracranial pressure and meningismus caused by the blood flow in the ventricles of the brain (17,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,8 For the 24-point BRAIN prediction score validation, a >6 mL definition was used. 7 A >6 and ≥12.5 mL definition 3 of HE was also explored for all scores. Discrimination of the HE scores was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Independently, a 24-point clinical score (BRAIN) was derived and validated for HE (>6 mL) from substudies of the Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trials (INTERACT1 and 2). 7 Score items were similar but included recurrent ICH and intraventricular hemorrhage extension. The 24-point score demonstrated acceptable discrimination but was limited by lack of baseline CTA and spot sign designation; the most robust predictor of expansion to date.…”
Section: Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The role of surgery in the treatment of ICH still remains inconclusive, despite recent large randomized trials, however. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Part of the controversy about the value of surgical interventions might be explained by the fact that hematoma volume, a key prognostic factor of interest, has rarely been measured in precise volumetric fashion in surgical outcome studies. [10][11][12][13][14] Instead, clot volume is commonly estimated by the formula ABC/2 until today, owing to the unparalleled applicability and time efficiency of this method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%