Background & Aims
Endoscopic findings such as esophageal rings, strictures, narrow-caliber esophagus, linear furrows, white plaques, and pallor or decreased vasculature might indicate the presence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We aimed to determine the prevalence and diagnostic utility of endoscopic features of EoE.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE, and GI meeting abstracts were searched to identify studies that included ≥ 10 patients with EoE and reported endoscopic findings. Pooled prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated using random- and mixed-effects models.
Results
The search yielded 100 articles and abstracts on 4678 patients with EoE and 2742 without (controls). In subjects with EoE, the overall pooled prevalence of esophageal rings was 44%, strictures 21%, narrow-caliber esophagus 9%, linear furrows 48%, white plaques 27%, and pallor/decreased vasculature 41%. Substantial heterogeneity existed among studies. Results from endoscopy examinations were normal in 17% of patients, but this number decreased to 7% when the analysis was limited to prospective studies (P<.05). Overall levels of sensitivity were modest, ranging from 15% to 48%, whereas levels of specificity were greater, ranging from 90% to 95%. Positive predictive values ranged from 51% to 73% and negative predictive values ranged from 74% to 84%.
Conclusions
There is heterogeneity among studies in the reported prevalence of endoscopic findings in patients with EoE, but in prospective studies, at least 1 abnormality was detected by endoscopy in 93% of patients. The operating characteristics of endoscopic findings alone are inadequate for diagnosis of EoE. Esophageal biopsies should be obtained from all patients with clinical features of EoE, regardless of the endoscopic appearance of the esophagus.
